[LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- From: "AramLanghans" <leica_r8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:11:38 -0700
Darn that autofocus. It thinks it is smarter than we are. Most of the
time it is almost as smart, and the rest of the time it is downright dumb.
Does look like a studio shot. 200 x 1.4 x.2 is a 560mm equivalent and I
assume hand held at a modest ISO? That is impressive.
Aram
> -----Original Message-----
> From: leicareflex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:leicareflex-
> bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Young
> Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2008 9:50 AM
> To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [LRflex] Studio shot?
>
> All:
>
> Here is a portrait which, I think, looks like it could pass for a
> studio portrait. But, it's not.
>
> The chap (name unknown to me) is a member of the "Squirrel Nut
> Zippers", and was taken, from in front of the stage, with a 200mm +
> 1.4 converter on the Oly E3, while the subject was playing like
> mad. Because the AF chose the Violin, rather than the face, it's
> just a wee bit soft in the face, but I don't think it hurts the shot,
> too badly.
>
> http://www.furnfeather.net/Temps/SQNZ.htm
>
> Comments, criticism, appreciated, as always.
>
> Cheers!
> ---
>
> David Young,
> Logan Lake, CANADA
>
> Limited Edition Prints at: www.furnfeather.net
> Personal Web-site at: www.main.furnfeather.net
> Stock Photography at: http://tinyurl.com/2amll4
>
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
> Archives are at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.6.7/1629 - Release Date:
> 8/23/2008 1:16 PM
>
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 270.6.7/1629 - Release Date: 8/23/2008
1:16 PM
- Follow-Ups:
- [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- From: David Young
- References:
- [LRflex] Studio shot?
- From: David Young
Other related posts:
- » [LRflex] Studio shot?
- » [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- » [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- » [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- » [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- » [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- » [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- » [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- » [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- » [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- » [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- » [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- » [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- » [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- » [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- » [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- » [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- » [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- » [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- » [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- [LRflex] Re: Studio shot?
- From: David Young
- [LRflex] Studio shot?
- From: David Young