[LRFlex] Re: Scanning (was Thanks for the warm welcome!)
- From: "Bill Lawlor" <wvl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:59:26 -0700
Re:Scanning (was Thanks for the warm welcome!)"For 35mm neg scanning I tend to
use my scanner's maximum resolution
(2700dpi), save it as a TIFF of around 20Mb, then save a version at
240 dpi for printing and then as a 90dpi JPEG for publishing on the
Net. A tip I picked up somewhere along the line is that the
resolution of the print file should be exactly divisible into the
printer resolution (in my case practically 720dpi). Otherwise the
printer software will start interpolating, which is not good for .."
...............................................
I learned about printing at 240 dpi last July at the Santa Fe Photography
Workshops. I took a class in digital printing taught by Bob Korn, printer for
Joel Meyerowitz and many top photographers. Bob said he always prints at 240
when using Epson printers. He compared 240 with other numbers and could see no
improvement above 240. I printed two images size 24X36 on Somerset Velvet paper
with the school's Epson 9600. 240 was just fine! I wonder why I never say the
240 setting in and of the many digital printing books and articles I have
studied?
Bill Lawlor
- References:
- [LRFlex] Thanks for the warm welcome!
- From: Patrick Werner
- [LRFlex] Re: Scanning (was Thanks for the warm welcome!)
- From: Alex Hurst
Other related posts:
- » [LRFlex] Re: Scanning (was Thanks for the warm welcome!)
- » [LRFlex] Re: Scanning (was Thanks for the warm welcome!)
- » [LRFlex] Re: Scanning (was Thanks for the warm welcome!)
- » [LRFlex] Re: Scanning (was Thanks for the warm welcome!)
- » [LRFlex] Re: Scanning (was Thanks for the warm welcome!)
- [LRFlex] Thanks for the warm welcome!
- From: Patrick Werner
- [LRFlex] Re: Scanning (was Thanks for the warm welcome!)
- From: Alex Hurst