[LRflex] SV: Re: SV: Re: IMPORTANT: Re: DMR Support
- From: "Tim Bedsted" <Tim.Bedsted@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 11:16:49 +0100
Colin,
Before you do anything in software land you have a design spec. I am not
asking for internal project status reports, but if Leica was working on the
bug-fix, they should be able to say what it will fix. Bear in mind Mr. Eckhardt
isn't giving any ETA or glimpse of the content
The run around we are getting is indicative if you aren't actually doing
anything on it, which I suspect is the case:(
I have been looking at the DMR, but I am not committing my money before I can
rest assured that I am not going to be stuck with a white elephant.
Best
Tim
________________________________
Fra: leicareflex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx på vegne af Colin Howarth
Sendt: lø 27-01-2007 10:20
Til: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Emne: [LRflex] Re: SV: Re: IMPORTANT: Re: DMR Support
On 27.01.2007, at 09:25, Tim Bedsted wrote:
> Leica have by now had the same amount of time to do a bug fix that
> they =
> originally had to write the entire piece of software!
This may be one of those 20/80 problems. The first 80% of the task
takes 80% of the time. The last 20% takes 80% of the time too.
> Mr. Erhardt isn't primising anything concerning content of v1.3 or =
> delivery times,
I expect he doesn't have a crystal ball.
> if they were hard at work, they should be able to give =
> us a preview/list of items being worked on, you hear nothing
> concrete =
> from him.
This is not how companies work. Maybe the Project Manager gets
reports, but I know of no company that gives weekly updates on the
problems they're facing.
> Concerning discontinuing DMR, did you really expect him to say =
> otherwise? If you want to clear your warehouse saying otherwise
> would be =
> nuts.
That's true. But did you hear that Canon have not claimed they are
discontinuing the 1DS Mk II?
> I have to say I am getting worried that the entire R-line is being =
> yanked.
Based on the following... ?
> After the introduction of the digilux 3, which can take =
> r-lenses, a number of r-seres lenses being doscontinued, no firmware =
> support for DMR, no concrete news of a R10.
And them selling them as fast as they can make them?
> I think the writing on the wall clearly says: goodbye Leica R/DMR.
And I think that spreading rumours based on software delays and the
phase of the moon is irresponsible.
This is not intended as a flame - I respect your opinion and could
understand DMR owner's possible irritation. I just think that, at
this time, there is no reason to worry.
colin
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
-- Binary/unsupported file stripped by Ecartis --
-- Type: application/ms-tnef
-- File: winmail.dat
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- Follow-Ups:
- [LRflex] DMR Support
- From: Colin Howarth
- References:
- [LRflex] IMPORTANT: Re: DMR Support
- From: David Young
- [LRflex] Re: IMPORTANT: Re: DMR Support
- From: Dave Saalsaa
- [LRflex] SV: Re: IMPORTANT: Re: DMR Support
- From: Tim Bedsted
- [LRflex] Re: SV: Re: IMPORTANT: Re: DMR Support
- From: Colin Howarth
Other related posts:
- » [LRflex] SV: Re: SV: Re: IMPORTANT: Re: DMR Support
- [LRflex] DMR Support
- From: Colin Howarth
- [LRflex] IMPORTANT: Re: DMR Support
- From: David Young
- [LRflex] Re: IMPORTANT: Re: DMR Support
- From: Dave Saalsaa
- [LRflex] SV: Re: IMPORTANT: Re: DMR Support
- From: Tim Bedsted
- [LRflex] Re: SV: Re: IMPORTANT: Re: DMR Support
- From: Colin Howarth