[LRflex] R 2x APO Extender Question
- From: Bob Shaw <rsphotoimages@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 11:54:32 -0700
I'm looking a another lens plus an extender (I'll confess when/if I buy
it).
Does anyone know for sure the answers to these two questions about the
2x APO Extender?
1. Will it work on the 70-180 APO? If so, at an effective 360mm
(2 x 180mm ), would the aperture be (f4) or 5.6?
2. Will it work on the 28-90 Asph? If so, at an effective 180mm
( 2x 90mm ), would the aperture be f9 ( 2x f4.5 ) or higher?
Any particular caveats about the 2x APO Extender? I have read none but
would appreciate user comments.
Thank you for any information you may be able to offer.
Bob
On Mar 31, 2007, at 11:22, David Young wrote:
At 31/03/2007, you wrote:
> In '84(?) here in Italy Tutti Fotografi magazine published an MTF
> analysis reporting that its best working aperture was 3.4, i.e. full
> aperture! So, as Tom was saying, the 180 f:3.4 Apo Telyt was designed
> to work in the night, probably for military purposes.
It was, indeed, designed, under contract, for the US Navy, who wished
to keep it "secret". However, they wrote the contract with E. Leitz
(Canada) so badly that there was nothing to prevent Leitz from
releasing a consumer version. When released, resolution was
specified as only being "limited by available film" !!!!
As has been mentioned, the only limitations are close focus, and that
is because of the optimization for distance/wide aperture use. Not a
bad compromise, at all!
Cheers!
---
David Young,
Logan Lake, CANADA
Wildlife Photographs: http://www.telyt.com/
Personal Web-pages: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- Follow-Ups:
- [LRflex] Re: R 2x APO Extender Question
- From: David Young
- References:
- [LRflex] Re: Leica 180 APO versus Nikkor 200
- From: Chris Birchenhall
- [LRflex] Re: Leica 180 APO versus Nikkor 200
- From: Thomas Schofield
- [LRflex] Re: Leica 180 APO versus Nikkor 200
- From: FLAVIO GORI
- [LRflex] Re: Leica 180 APO versus Nikkor 200
- From: David Young
Other related posts:
- » [LRflex] R 2x APO Extender Question
- » [LRflex] Re: R 2x APO Extender Question
- » [LRflex] Re: R 2x APO Extender Question
- » [LRflex] Re: R 2x APO Extender Question
- » [LRflex] Re: R 2x APO Extender Question
- » [LRflex] Re: R 2x APO Extender Question
- » [LRflex] Re: R 2x APO Extender Question
- » [LRflex] Re: R 2x APO Extender Question
- » [LRflex] Re: R 2x APO Extender Question
- » [LRflex] Re: R 2x APO Extender Question
- » [LRflex] Re: R 2x APO Extender Question
- » [LRflex] Re: R 2x APO Extender Question
- [LRflex] Re: R 2x APO Extender Question
- From: David Young
- [LRflex] Re: Leica 180 APO versus Nikkor 200
- From: Chris Birchenhall
- [LRflex] Re: Leica 180 APO versus Nikkor 200
- From: Thomas Schofield
- [LRflex] Re: Leica 180 APO versus Nikkor 200
- From: FLAVIO GORI
- [LRflex] Re: Leica 180 APO versus Nikkor 200
- From: David Young