[LRflex] Re: Query: 35mm f2.8
- From: Mattia Gilardi <mattiag@xxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:06:49 +0200
On Oct 23, 2006, at 9:48 PM, keith.r.edwards@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I don't think the lens should give the result you describe (at
> least not
> to the extent you seem to have experienced) so I'll offer another
> explana=
> tion
> to the list of 'possible causes' - is there any evidence of oil on
> the bl=
> ades?
> The one time I saw this sort of thing happen the lens (a 50 mm
> f1.4) had
> gone oily - lowers contrast and might lead to the sort of effect
> you desc=
> ribe.
> If it is oily investigate getting it cleaned - if you don't need f2
> it wi=
> ll
> be nearly as good and even if you plan to sell it it will add value.
>
> Best regards
> Keith
>
Hi,
first of all, since this is my first message here, I must thank you
all for providing invaluable content to be lurked by me in the past
months :-)
Second, I apologize for my bad English.
I think I have a similar problem in my 35/2 R, late model.
In difficult situations, it is very flare prone, and a very strange
one. Sometime ray of light are "curved", sometime are similar to a
rainbow.
It is also very sensible to ghost with sun on field or near the
border of image, and it shows very noticeable red ghosts.
This is true with both film (on a R6.2) and digital (on a Canon 5D).
The serial number is 326xxx, do you think this is normal for this
lens, and younger ones are better coated or something, or I should
send my lens to Solms for checking/cleaning, etc.?
I think so because I have other lenses, even wider, that perform
much, much, better in similar situations.
Here are some example, some very bad picture that however show the
problem.
All three taken with 5D, unretouched, just RAW converted (I repeat,
though, that with film is the same. Just don'have a scanner :) )
Sea ones at f8 and night one more open. All three with hood extended.
http://homepage.mac.com/mattiag/35summi001.jpg
http://homepage.mac.com/mattiag/35summi002.jpg
http://homepage.mac.com/mattiag/35summi003.jpg
Best regards and thanks,
Mattia Gilardi
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- Follow-Ups:
- [LRflex] Re: Query: 35mm f2.8
- From: Slobodan Dimitrov
- [LRflex] Re: Query: 35mm f2.8
- From: Aram Langhans
- References:
- [LRflex] Re: Query: 35mm f2.8
- From: keith . r . edwards
Other related posts:
- » [LRflex] Query: 35mm f2.8
- » [LRflex] Re: Query: 35mm f2.8
- » [LRflex] Re: Query: 35mm f2.8
- » [LRflex] Re: Query: 35mm f2.8
- » [LRflex] Re: Query: 35mm f2.8
- » [LRflex] Re: Query: 35mm f2.8
- » [LRflex] Re: Query: 35mm f2.8
- » [LRflex] Re: Query: 35mm f2.8
- » [LRflex] Re: Query: 35mm f2.8
- » [LRflex] Re: Query: 35mm f2.8
- » [LRflex] Re: Query: 35mm f2.8
- » [LRflex] Re: Query: 35mm f2.8
- » [LRflex] Re: Query: 35mm f2.8
- » [LRflex] Re: Query: 35mm f2.8
- [LRflex] Re: Query: 35mm f2.8
- From: Slobodan Dimitrov
- [LRflex] Re: Query: 35mm f2.8
- From: Aram Langhans
- [LRflex] Re: Query: 35mm f2.8
- From: keith . r . edwards