[LRflex] Re: Prince William's dream
- From: "Dr. Elliot Puritz" <drpuritz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 20:17:25 -0400
Phillipe and William:
I have the D200 and some of the very excellent Nikon zoom and prime lenses.
Might I say that the results with the camera surpass almost all of my
expectations. Enlargements ( so far only 12x20 ) are virtually perfect. I
realize that many here say that the DMR is superior. Not having a DMR, nor
having the opportunity to see enlargements of photos taken with the DMR, I
can only accept what my respected and talented colleagues have said.
Nevertheless, should anyone here "settle" for the D200 then I can assure
them that the camera is capable of doing far more then most of us can
accomplish. Furthermore, the newly released and inexpensive D40x (and the
preceding D40 ) is light, and has many of the features that the D200 has.
If one is looking for an excellent "stop gap" solution while awaiting the
R10 then the D40 with the amazingly inexpensive-but very well reviewed-18-55
zoom lens would be just about perfect.
I'm still waiting for the R10....:}...
Elliot
----- Original Message -----
From: "Philippe Amard" <phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 3:44 PM
Subject: [LRflex] Re: Prince William's dream
> William Abbott wrote:
>
>>I am a "wannabe" newspaper or magazine photographer;
>>
>>
> Go N then - no alternative, very unfortunately this is the only option
> left.
> The D200 is a wonderful tool - with beautiful fast AF fast lenses - I
> spent monday evening reading the text of a slide show for an N user
> friend of mine - his photos were projected 2m x 3 and were pure wonders.
> With you could see that.
>
> But from what I read between your lines, a small, ready to shoot , easy
> to use camera would probably be ok along the DMR/R while waitng for the
> the R10.
> Have you considered the G7 - I know I have a +++ bias for that camera,
> and I know why - slim, light, versatile (with add-on lenses you get
> amazing results at both ends - macro and tele) fairly cheap and nearly
> disposable - can be connected to TV screen and is 10mp, not bad after
> all, is it not?
>
> Trying to find a duplicate of the R combo might mean redundancy for one
> or the other - so why not have a look at something completely different?
> This is just another suggestion.
> Yours
>
> Phil..x
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> Archives are at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
