[LRflex] Re: Pentax - WAS CBU - as a Collectible

The Pentax 135 I have is a 2.5 (strange figure) excellent quality but 
heavy, doesn't quite hold its own against a Zeiss 2.8/135 Sonnar (CY)
Douglas

Philippe Amard wrote:
> Hi Art,
> I also had the 55mm 1.8 and the 50mm 1.4  the latter as real fine too.
> And the 135 I think it was 2.8 but I don't remeber very well.
>
> As to the 28 I had also used it with the "reversing" ring for pseudo 
> macro  and it was fun.
>
> PhilX
>
>
> NATSTEK@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>   
>> I had my camera converted to silver oxide battery usage a long time ago. The 
>> SMC Takumar 28mm f/3.5 was a super lens and still can hold its own.
>>
>>
>> Art
>>
>>
>> ------
>> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>>    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
>> Archives are at:
>>    http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>>
>>  
>>
>>     
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>     http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> Archives are at:
>     http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
>   
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
    http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: