Hi Art, I also had the 55mm 1.8 and the 50mm 1.4 the latter as real fine too. And the 135 I think it was 2.8 but I don't remeber very well. As to the 28 I had also used it with the "reversing" ring for pseudo macro and it was fun. PhilX NATSTEK@xxxxxxx wrote: >I had my camera converted to silver oxide battery usage a long time ago. The >SMC Takumar 28mm f/3.5 was a super lens and still can hold its own. > > >Art > > >------ >Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm >Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > > > ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/