[LRflex] Re: Pentax - WAS CBU - as a Collectible

  • From: Philippe Amard <phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:06:54 +0100

Hi Art,
I also had the 55mm 1.8 and the 50mm 1.4  the latter as real fine too.
And the 135 I think it was 2.8 but I don't remeber very well.

As to the 28 I had also used it with the "reversing" ring for pseudo 
macro  and it was fun.

PhilX


NATSTEK@xxxxxxx wrote:

>I had my camera converted to silver oxide battery usage a long time ago. The 
>SMC Takumar 28mm f/3.5 was a super lens and still can hold its own.
>
>
>Art
>
>
>------
>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
>Archives are at:
>    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
>  
>
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
    //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: