[LRflex] Re: Panos
- From: Andrew Nemeth <azn@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 06:16:33 +1000
On 12/04/2008, at 4:11 PM, Howard Cummer wrote:
Getting the nodal point is crucial if you
have near items that you want in sync with far items as you stitch
prints together.
Getting the Nodal Point exactly right only matters if you are
shooting with a fisheye lens. Otherwise a little (+/- 10mm) slack is
okay. You can always touch things up in photoshop, which you
generally have to do for panos anyway.
In 2006 I did a linear panorama of a 250m row of shops along a
highway. Each shot was taken 5m apart and then approx. 80x were
stitched together into a single image. 5m between shots: that is
what I would call a fair bit of Nodal Point slack :?)
The result? The "Lawson GWH Heritage Shops" linear panorama at:
<http://4020.net/bmvr/#lawsonshops>
I use the Novoflex set up - see the URL:
http://www.360rage.com/panorama-hardware-item.php?i=12
Someone complained this is too expensive. Not really - see the 360
Precision mounts at:
<http://www.360precision.com/>
... which weigh in at @ £540 UK Pounds (!)
FWIW I made my own VR mount years ago so I could use my Leica 16mm
fisheye on a motorised M:
<http://leica.nemeng.com/003f.shtml>
Since it is a "swinging mount", it can be pointed up for a vertical
shot. This lets you shoot a full sphere with 8 shots: 6x
horizontally, 1-up, 1-down.
Regards,
Andrew N.
<http://nemeng.com>
Blue Mountains Australia
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
