[LRflex] Re: PS RE: Angle of View
- From: Charlie Falke <chfalke@xxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:18:16 -0500
of view will have different circles of coverage; i.e.
able to cover different formats or allow more or less
shift movements.
Exactly!
Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
Doug, All,
Just catching up on this thread. Wouldn't it be simpler to
call out the format after the format? Then there isn't any
ambiguity about what the horizontal and vertical angles are
relative to the diagonal, and there isn't any figuring to
do on the presentation end. 50mm 24X36, or 25mm 13.3X17 (four-third),
or 127mm 4X5, as the case may be.
--
Charlie Falke _____ /\
| __/\__/------/__)
|(____\/_________/
"One test result is worth | |/ `o
one thousand expert opinions" - Wernher Von Braun 0 N4003M
"Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Albert Einstein
- References:
- [LRflex] Re: PS RE: Angle of View
- From: wildlightphoto
Other related posts:
- » [LRflex] PS RE: Angle of View
- » [LRflex] Re: PS RE: Angle of View
- » [LRflex] Re: PS RE: Angle of View
- » [LRflex] Re: PS RE: Angle of View
- » [LRflex] PS RE: Angle of View
- » [LRflex] Re: PS RE: Angle of View
- » [LRflex] Re: PS RE: Angle of View
- » [LRflex] Re: PS RE: Angle of View
- » [LRflex] Re: PS RE: Angle of View
- » [LRflex] Re: PS RE: Angle of View
of view will have different circles of coverage; i.e. able to cover different formats or allow more or less shift movements.
Exactly! Doug Herr Birdman of Sacramento http://www.wildlightphoto.com
- [LRflex] Re: PS RE: Angle of View
- From: wildlightphoto