[LRflex] Re: Non Leica, Digital Wanderings, The R10 tha I dream of.
- From: Philippe Amard <phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 07:09:22 +0200
Ok with you Elliot,
but printers and the media now ASK for digital files, that's also why.
More, labs progressively give up processing slides and digitalizing
them, this is a sorry period we're living.
Yours
Phileicgenieux
Dr. Puritz wrote:
>Xavier:
>
>Thanks very much for posting the interesting digital photographs. I believe
>that some of us feel that a wide range of so called "point and shoot"
>cameras will make very acceptable images if such images are to be viewed on
>a computer screen. Such cameras now come with image stabilization, more
>sophisticated algorithms, and lenses that cover amazing focal lengths.
>Indeed, it may not be until larger prints are made that one will be able to
>discern the meaningful differences in the quality of images made with
>superior lenses and cameras with higher megapixel capability. Moreover,
>IMHO, one of the reasons that digital photography is doing as well as it is,
>is that images are taken and simply viewed on monitors and sent over the
>internet. If one has no need to make larger prints or enlargements I wonder
>if additional money need be spent for higher end cameras and lenses. I am
>asking a question not making a dogmatic statement.
>
>Allow me to also pose another related question: For viewing images on
>computer monitors or sending to others over the internet to also be viewed
>on monitors, is there a reason to use our expensive and superior Leica gear,
>then scan the tranny or negative, and then do manipulation in PS, Corel,
>etc. or will the results with the camera that Xavier is using do the trick
>with identical editing? Indeed, let's go a step further: Is there a reason
>to use Medium Format if the aim is to view images on ones computer?
>Furthermore, will the M8 possibly add anything worth the price for simply
>uploading images to the computer for viewing, etc.?
>
>Elliot
>
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Bille Xavier F." <hot_billexf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 4:21 PM
>Subject: [LRflex] Non Leica, Digital Wanderings, The R10 tha I dream of.
>
>
>
>
>>Hello To all,
>>
>>In these days of Photokina, I went to an old Castle, Vaux le Vicomte,
>>known
>>for a very famous scandal (at the time of Louis XIV...) involving the
>>landlord of the property, Nicolas Fouquet.
>>
>>Last Sunday, some dancers and comedians animated the castle, let me
>>introduce the Roi Soleil
>>
>>http://xavierf.b.free.fr/Temp/Roi_Soleil.jpg
>>
>>If you take the time to peep, you will probably say: wow, that's Leica
>>35mm
>>of hiZ R7...
>>
>>Wrong guess, Olympus Camedia C300, 3 MPix, check the EXIF, paid a 50
>>Pouloutes on Ebay...
>>
>>Of course, there is a little polish from.... Corel Paintshop pro, 3
>>clicks,
>>all automatic...
>>
>>Here is another one:
>>http://xavierf.b.free.fr/Temp/Buffet.jpg
>>
>>Surprising, eh?
>>
>>---> it brings me to the main subject of this post: I just happen to
>>stumble
>>on this point and shoot camera which is the ideal replacement for the
>>aging
>>olympus:
>>http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/canon/powershot_a710-review/index.shtml
>>
>>Of course it is not a Leica but it seems to do a god job AFAIC. A nice
>>complement to my R7 and its lenses.
>>
>>---> Given the tremendous possibilities of this little Point and shoot,
>>given to see what a simple old digital camera can do, I believe there is a
>>market, potentially great, for a body that would have the same function as
>>the Leica M8 but adapted to the R series.
>>
>>The only thing would be the view finder. Well, a EVF would probably do
>>(although a nice Optical would do better). But a well designed body,
>>simple, noisless at 1600 ISO, is probably a winner. Even if it needs ROM
>>lenses to be amended to give the information for the processing unit.
>>
>>I told you, these are digital wanderings, I take the chance to post them
>>as
>>the Moderator (David Young) is at Photokina, probably our best Ambassador
>>for the new R10....
>>
>>Regards.
>>
>>---------------------------------
>>Xavier F. BILLE
>>Maisons-Alfort - France.
>>
>>
>>------
>>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
>>Archives are at:
>> http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>>
>>
>
>------
>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
>Archives are at:
> http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
>
>
>
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- Follow-Ups:
- [LRflex] Re: Non Leica, Digital Wanderings, The R10 tha I dream of.
- From: Bille Xavier F.
- References:
- [LRflex] Non Leica, Digital Wanderings, The R10 tha I dream of.
- From: Bille Xavier F.
- [LRflex] Re: Non Leica, Digital Wanderings, The R10 tha I dream of.
- From: Dr. Puritz
Other related posts:
- » [LRflex] Non Leica, Digital Wanderings, The R10 tha I dream of.
- » [LRflex] Re: Non Leica, Digital Wanderings, The R10 tha I dream of.
- » [LRflex] Re: Non Leica, Digital Wanderings, The R10 tha I dream of.
- » [LRflex] Re: Non Leica, Digital Wanderings, The R10 tha I dream of.
- » [LRflex] Re: Non Leica, Digital Wanderings, The R10 tha I dream of.
- » [LRflex] Re: Non Leica, Digital Wanderings, The R10 tha I dream of.
- » [LRflex] Re: Non Leica, Digital Wanderings, The R10 tha I dream of.
- [LRflex] Re: Non Leica, Digital Wanderings, The R10 tha I dream of.
- From: Bille Xavier F.
- [LRflex] Non Leica, Digital Wanderings, The R10 tha I dream of.
- From: Bille Xavier F.
- [LRflex] Re: Non Leica, Digital Wanderings, The R10 tha I dream of.
- From: Dr. Puritz