[LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- From: Philippe AMARD <philippe.amard@xxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 20:31:20 +0200
Matsushita David, matsushita
And a good move too - n° 1 selling P&S in France and among the leaders
in Europe ...
Makes money for R&D, does it not?
phx
David Young wrote:
Andy wrote:
Your concept makes alot of sense esp when you consider how many of us
are still clinging to sl's and such.
Back in 2006, I wrote a detailed email to Leica's R10 team, about
Doug's idea. They received it (this, I know, from the "read reply")
but they never bothered to say "thank you."
So, as I said, I have no idea what they might, or might not, build.
All I know, is that they are definitely building "something".
I remember reading on one of the other forums the Lee made the
announcement about the M8 being upgradeble by Leica and it caused
quite a racaus among retailers because they thought they would be
left out of the loop.
Ah yes... I remember it well.... And I can understand the dealers
being "choked" at that idea. However, I gather that was not the
"straw which broke the camel's back".
If Leica has the sense to pull off what you are suggesting I think it
would be a real marketing coup.
Indeed! But will they? Are they that smart? New management gives
hope for "yes". History says "no". Time will tell.
At that point you would see alot of pros migrating to Leica and Leica
would regain some of their stature.
While all of us on the list do know the Leica name and it's quality,
Leica would have to make it's name known to a lot of the newer pro's
out there.
At this point, putting Leica designed (if not built) lenses on the
Panashiba cameras is probably the best thing they have going for them,
in terms of (re) building brand awareness.
As far as the quality control is concerned I think the DMR would have
had a longer and more sucessful life if Leica could have afforded to
keep production in house and been able to give it a longer life
cycle. This would also have to be addressed in anything they bring
out in the future
Agreed.
Cheers!
---
David Young,
Logan Lake, CANADA
Limited Edition Prints at: www.furnfeather.net
Personal Web-site at: www.main.furnfeather.net
Stock Photography at: http://tinyurl.com/2amll4
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- Follow-Ups:
- [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- From: David Young
- References:
- [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- From: David Young
- [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- From: Andy Wagner
- [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- From: David Young
Other related posts:
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
Andy wrote:
Your concept makes alot of sense esp when you consider how many of us are still clinging to sl's and such.
Back in 2006, I wrote a detailed email to Leica's R10 team, about Doug's idea. They received it (this, I know, from the "read reply") but they never bothered to say "thank you."
So, as I said, I have no idea what they might, or might not, build. All I know, is that they are definitely building "something".
I remember reading on one of the other forums the Lee made the announcement about the M8 being upgradeble by Leica and it caused quite a racaus among retailers because they thought they would be left out of the loop.
Ah yes... I remember it well.... And I can understand the dealers being "choked" at that idea. However, I gather that was not the "straw which broke the camel's back".
If Leica has the sense to pull off what you are suggesting I think it would be a real marketing coup.
Indeed! But will they? Are they that smart? New management gives hope for "yes". History says "no". Time will tell.
At that point you would see alot of pros migrating to Leica and Leica would regain some of their stature. While all of us on the list do know the Leica name and it's quality, Leica would have to make it's name known to a lot of the newer pro's out there.
At this point, putting Leica designed (if not built) lenses on the Panashiba cameras is probably the best thing they have going for them, in terms of (re) building brand awareness.
As far as the quality control is concerned I think the DMR would have had a longer and more sucessful life if Leica could have afforded to keep production in house and been able to give it a longer life cycle. This would also have to be addressed in anything they bring out in the future
Agreed. Cheers! --- David Young, Logan Lake, CANADA Limited Edition Prints at: www.furnfeather.net Personal Web-site at: www.main.furnfeather.net Stock Photography at: http://tinyurl.com/2amll4 ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- From: David Young
- [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- From: David Young
- [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- From: Andy Wagner
- [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- From: David Young