[LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- From: David Young <dsy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 31 May 2008 09:12:19 -0700
Neil wrote:
I recall Doug's idea. However, for many reasons, unless one is a primary
manufacturer of all electronic components it could be difficult to
impossible to retain the backwards-compatibility of such a system. I
suspect it is much easier to offer R10, R11, etc. as with earlier
film-only "Rs". In short, I'm not so much against the modular concept as I
am accepting of the practicality of integrated bodies.
I've talked with a few electronics engineers and they seem to feel
that it is very do-able. The electronic specific to the sensor would
be in the back.. the rest in the body. That's why the back would cost
more than just a sensor change ... but still, very do-able.
But then, I'm not designing it!
Cheers!
---
David Young,
Logan Lake, CANADA
Limited Edition Prints at: www.furnfeather.net
Personal Web-site at: www.main.furnfeather.net
Stock Photography at: http://tinyurl.com/2amll4
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- References:
- [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- From: Neil Gould
Other related posts:
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- » [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
I recall Doug's idea. However, for many reasons, unless one is a primary manufacturer of all electronic components it could be difficult to impossible to retain the backwards-compatibility of such a system. I suspect it is much easier to offer R10, R11, etc. as with earlier film-only "Rs". In short, I'm not so much against the modular concept as I am accepting of the practicality of integrated bodies.
- [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras
- From: Neil Gould