[LRflex] Re: Modular cameras

That kind of set-up would sure get my vote too !


Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 07:36:06 -0700To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: 
dsy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: [LRflex] Re: Modular cameras Neil Gould  wrote:
 A practical way to offer modularity wasdemonstrated with the DMR, yet I don't 
hear as much call around here for aDMR-2 as there is for an R-10.Hi Neil!The 
reason you don't hear calls for a DMR-2 is that Leica (Hr. Kaufmann, himself) 
have already said that the new camera will be called the R10.As for the DMR-2, 
Doug Herr came up with that idea over two years ago.  The idea was a digital 
only body which, including the digital back, would be R9 sized.   All the basic 
electronics, battery, card holder, etc. would be the body - where the film bits 
used to be; while the sensor and what electronics are necessary to run it, 
would be in the back.  This would help Leica in several ways.  The cost to 
market would be lower, as the basic body, mirror mechanism, finder etc., are 
already engineered and could be used with few changes.  As well, it would be 
possible to bring an AF-confirmation model to market first, by simply buying 
the necessary sensors/chips from Japan - and these are readily available.  
Later, a full AF model could arrive and both could co-exist, much as the R5 & 
R6 did.    Later still, various changes to the body could be offered ... such 
as removable finders (like the Nikon 'F') or a brighter finder (at higher cost) 
much like the SL's finder, etc.  Over time, new bodies, with newer features, 
could be made, so long as they all accepted the same back.  Sort of a 35mm 
sized, digi, Hasselblad, whose many models all accepted the same backs.But the 
big key would be the sensor.  Let's assume that the first one would be 14 
megapixels (this is all speculation - I have no knowledge of this).  Two years 
later, they introduce an 18mp model.  But with the "smaller" model  remaining 
in the line at a lower price ... so that buyers would have a choice of pixel 
count and price levels.  Two years later still, the 22mp sensor is 
introduced... and the 18mp becomes the lower cost option, with the 14mp model 
being discontinued. The advantages, to Leica, aside from lower cost/ quicker 
time to market would be that they could offer pros the one thing that Leica's 
competition is not offering them.  Protection from obsolescence.  That alone, 
might be enough to make many pros move from brands N & C to brand L.If we 
assume that the body sells for $3000 and the back for $2000, the price is no 
worse than an M8.  But if Leica can sell you a new back, every two to four 
years, they've picked up a gravy train (after all, the electronics are less 
expensive to build than the mechanics of the basic body) while offering a huge 
financial advantage to the pro market they wish to capture.  It would also 
create a used market, where the cameras, because of their upgradability, would 
keep much more of their value that most digitals.  Another reason for Pros to 
buy Leica.Such a camera would combine the legendary longevity of a Leica body 
with the ability to keep it current, electronically.  Let's face it, even those 
Leica enthusiasts who struggle to afford their cameras and lenses could come up 
with 2k$ every 4 years, for a new back.  After all, that would be just $500 per 
year... within the range of almost any hobbyist.  The pros & advanced (read: 
better heeled)  amateurs would keep up with the newest, while the poorer among 
us (that's me) would probably stay two years behind the curve ... for lower 
cost.  But we'd still by buying, to keep relatively "up to date".Will Leica 
build such camera?  I have absolutely no idea.   But to me, it makes a lot of 
sense, as a way for a "niche player" to increase the size of their niche.
---
David Young,       
Logan Lake, CANADA 
Limited Edition Prints at: www.furnfeather.net
Personal Web-site at: www.main.furnfeather.net
Stock Photography at: http://tinyurl.com/2amll4

Other related posts: