Indeed, and a wonderful thing it is too. The pleasure of using an M camera by far outweighs its practical aspects (apart from the weight and compactness). As a predominantly wide-angle person, 28mm is almost too long as a standard lens for me, I have less of the "seeing " problem there, that comes into its own when I'm using my Rollei 6006, when you've only got 12 shots on a roll and have to carry a hundredweight of gear and a tripod, you certainly think more than twice about composition and parameters. :-) So, my first two projects for today have just rolled in so it's time to start thinking in German again. Bye for now Douglas William G. Lamb, III wrote: > Hello Douglas, > > > To them, the simplicity of the body, clear, bright viewfinder and > the way the M forces you to "see" is a revelation. (Isn't this what > Leica M photography is all about?) They have mostly all discovered > as well that one body and a 35/1.4 can do 90+% of their shooting. > > The more things change, the more they remain the same, right? > > > To abandon totally the simplicity of the M way would be a > huge mistake, IMO. I could go on and on..., but I'm sure you > are following this. > > Best Wishes, > > William > > At 03:13 AM 5/31/2007, you wrote: > >> William, >> I use almost everything :-) >> M2, M6, M4-2, CL, CLE (not quite Leica) IIIG, SL(several), SL2 >> (several), SL2Mot, R5 and R7, when I have time (usually about 3 to 4 >> weeks a year). >> > > > > ------ > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: > http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm > Archives are at: > //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/ > > ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/