Thanks all who commented -I've since posted the original and a last version following George's prompt and advice, which I think is better for number 2.
thanks again Bien cordialement de Metz Phx Lluis Ripoll wrote:
Hi Philippe,Ah malin!, when some minutes ago I've mentionned the Angenieux I can't imagine this superb picture, the Angenieux lenses have a superb rendition, I think I've already mentionned that on the 80's I've tested the 90 Angenieux with the 90 R Summicron, fine details was better on Angenieux and his contrast was a little more smooth.Nevertheless on this set the second is my favorite.Concerning the Summicron flare ... I honestly think "tu es trop éxigeant mon ami", some little imperfections are beautiful.... otherwise how you define the "Gamour"?Amitiés Lluis El 31/01/2009, a las 8:45, Philippe AMARD escribió:Contre-jours:<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/album368/2009-Flare+o+the+cron-1080476.jpg.html >L1 - Summicron 50 - better viewed large<http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/album368/2009-Botanique-1080474.jpg.html <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/album368/2009-Botanique-1080474.jpg.html>>L1 -Summicron 50 -<http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/151337-1/2009-Canal-Contre-jour-1080531.jpg <http://gallery.leica-users.org/d/151337-1/2009-Canal-Contre-jour-1080531.jpg>>L1 - Angénieux 70 x 3 at 210 - f 22 Comments and criticism welcome as usual Bien cordialement de Metz Phxyz _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information_______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information