[LRflex] Re: Leica 180 APO versus Nikkor 200

In '84(?) here in Italy Tutti Fotografi magazine published an MTF
analysis reporting that its best working aperture was 3.4, i.e. full
aperture! So, as Tom was saying, the 180 f:3.4 Apo Telyt was designed
to work in the night, probably for military purposes.

Flavio


On 31/03/07, Thomas Schofield <tdschofield@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Chris,
>
> I've owned both the 180 3.4 and Summicron APO lenses,
> Both are fantastic.  Only downside to the 3.4 is the
> close focusing distance.  Upside is the (relatively)
> light weight.  It was designed for night surveilance
> photography, so it is optimum or near so wide open!
> You DEFINITELY will want to pick up the original 2x
> extender, and don't spend the extra $$ on the newer
> APO converter for this lens, as the original extender
> was designed with the 3.4 lens.  You will have an
> excellent 360 6.8 for an extra 200-250!  Again, don't
> be afraid to shoot it wide open, even with the
> extender!
>
> It is excellent for B&W.  I recall Leitz advertising
> materials showed a b&w scenic shot with the 180 3.4
> and an orange filter to demonstrate the extreme
> sharpness of their lenses, and then with the 2x to
> show how there is little loss with the 2x -- they also
> compared using the 2x to simply enlarging an area from
> the shot without the 2x, to show how much sharper it
> is with the 2x.
>
> Don't ever be concerned with using the lens in high
> contrast situations -- it was designed for them.  When
> people say it has high contrast it is in the sense
> that it will hold detail in shadows and highlights
> like other lenses can't.  Get a loop and look at the
> detail in the bird's dark feathers and white feathers,
> not whether the reflections in the water are burning
> out.  If your highlights burn out, it is exposure, not
> the lens being "too contrasty."  You will also see
> more shadow detail in available light shots.
>
> Good choice, Enjoy!
>
> Tom Schofield
>
>
> --- Chris Birchenhall <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > A local dealer let me try out a 3-cam 180 Apo f3.4.
> > I took it out on my SL2.
> > Yes it is a sharp lens, but you have to control
> > contrast or use it where
> > contrast is not too demanding or high contrast helps
> > with the photograph?
> > Here is one of my first shots on Superia 400, yes a
> > common bird shot (wrong
> > group I know!); it was a dull day but the contrast
> > here is in my view too
> > high.
> >
> >
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/7180494@N02/440574535/in/photostream/
> >
> > Here is a simple detail from a canal boat; here the
> > contrast helps:
> >
> >
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/7180494@N02/440574541/in/photostream/
> >
> > Needless to say I bought the lens!
> >
> > Here one taken with the R8 and Velvia 50 where I
> > have exploited the contrast
> > - I am a sucker for cloudscapes:
> >
> >
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/7180494@N02/440574545/in/photostream/
> >
> > I am wondering if this lens is not best for B&W? I
> > will want to compare it
> > to the 80-200 f4 (with the latter at its 200 end). I
> > don't have a Nikon 200
> > to compare.
> >
> > Chris
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection.
> Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
> http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>     http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> Archives are at:
>     http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>


-- 
FLAVIO GORI
http://www.LoScrittoio.it
Edizioni in Rete

http://flaviogori.googlepages.com/home
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
    http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: