Dear Flavio,
In my experience the 180 APO is better - no question - in terms of
contrast, picture detail and colour rendition - but sometimes you
want something a little longer - and that is where the 200 comes in.
It is a very good lens in its own right but not in the same league as
the 180 APO.
Cheers
Howard
On 30 Mar 2007, at 2:14 PM, FreeLists Mailing List Manager wrote:
> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:52:47 +0200
> From: "FLAVIO GORI" <flaviogori@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [LRflex] Re: Preparing for the Rugby 7's
>
> Howard,
> I also use an Apo Telyt 180 Apo with my R4s and previuosly with
> SL2. In my
> experience (since 1985) it is one the very (very) best example of
> optics,
> especially (though not only) in the red region.
> What is your opinion, also comparing with your Nikkor 200? Any one
> is using
> Apo Telyt AND Grenoble 400 mm? Any report would be greatly
> appreciated.
>
> Many thanks!
>
> Flavio
>
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/