[LRFlex] Re: [LRFlex]Doug's Close-up pages.

At 3/23/2005, you wrote:

David Young <dnr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I cannot tell the difference between a shot taken
> with a good multi-element close-up lens and one taken with extension
> tubes.... even though I "know" that the tubes are better.

Ain't nessesarily so... the 90 'cron shows a LOT of field curvature with extension tubes, does MUCH better with an ELPRO.


Hmmm... the 90 'cron doesn't work worth a damn with a 2x converter either! Do they make a 2x Elpro for that?

I'd originally hoped to use the 2x with the 90/2 to replace my 180/4 but it simply was not possible. Results were absolutely terrible. Yet it's fine with the 80~200/f4 and, of course, the 400 Telyt. It even works OK with the 50 'cron. Don't know why the 90 doesn't like the extenders. ;-(
----------

David Young,     | égalité, liberté,
Victoria, CANADA | fraternité et Beaujolais.

Personal Web-site at:
        http://www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr
Leica Reflex Forum web-page:
        http://www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm

------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
   www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
   www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: