[LRflex] Re: Jay
- From: "Axel Collier" <axel.collier@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:37:08 +0200
SORRY
I hope one of this links works :
KLIK on the photo to enlarge
https://picasaweb.google.com/Axelred0/28Apr201103?authkey=Gv1sRgCN-f2-eB1a6A5QE#
or
https://picasaweb.google.com/Axelred0/28Apr201103?authkey=Gv1sRgCN-f2-eB1a6A5QE#5600730722739100066
if it does not work i do not know what suddenly went wron with the links :-(
maybee i will try something else tomorrow
greetings, Axel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Axel Collier" <axel.collier@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 10:29 PM
Subject: [LRflex] Re: Jay
> maybee this works better ?
> https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/webUpload?uname=Axelred0&aid=5600730610708298433
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Ward" <ilovaussiesheps@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 8:27 PM
> Subject: [LRflex] Re: Jay
>
>
>> Hi David,
>> Based on Axel's 'successes' with the poor source material of an online
>> jpeg, assuming that is what he used, I suspect you, Davd, could far
>> exceed
>> his results on an esthetic basis using the RAW original file as source
>> material. What I am alluding to is Reprocessing your original DNG, NEF,
>> TIFF, or CR file, through the RAW conversion process and focusing your
>> efforts only upon making the branch look good. Assuming success pulling
>> those highlights down (many raw files have some 'headroom' to do this-
>> but
>> no guarantees) you can use a photoshop type process with layers to blend
>> the new branch in to an existing image file.
>> Based on my limited experience doing this, it is either happiness and joy
>> staight off executing the blend or a dark and futile nightmare that makes
>> you rethink your choices in hobbies! :-)
>> Not to be hyperbolous or anything.
>>
>> peace
>> R in mi.
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________
>>
>> Sarcasm Is Loading
>> [=][=][=][ ][ ][ ][ ][ ]
>> Please Wait
>> ____________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>> https://picasaweb.google.com/Axelred0/28Apr201102?authkey=Gv1sRgCNybs_Go19KTUg#5600674769753005794
>>>
>>> G'Mornin' Axel!
>>>
>>> No to worry... I don't mind, at all.
>>>
>>> However, in both your tries, you have the grey branch that I got. Yes,
>>> it
>>> tones down the image, but does not look at all like the real thing.
>>> That's why, when I got that "grey look" I brought up the contrast, to
>>> make
>>> it look more like the original. This resulted in a branch with still
>>> blown
>>> highlights, but not so bad as in the first efforts... or at least, so I
>>> thought.
>>>
>>> See: http://www.furnfeather.net/Temps/Jay-3.html
>>>
>>> compared to the first efforts...
>>>
>>> http://www.furnfeather.net/Temps/Jay-2.html
>>>
>>> As always, all input is appreciated, for it's how we all learn.
>>>
>>> cheers!
>>> --
>>> David Young - Photographer
>>> Logan Lake, CANADA
>>>
>>
>> ------
>> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>> http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
>> Archives are at:
>> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
> Archives are at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
