On Apr 28, 2011, at 1:27 PM, Richard Ward wrote: > Based on Axel's 'successes' with the poor source material of an online jpeg, > assuming that is what he used, I suspect you, Davd, could far exceed his > results on an esthetic basis using the RAW original file as source material. > What I am alluding to is Reprocessing your original DNG, NEF, TIFF, or CR > file, through the RAW conversion process and focusing your efforts only upon > making the branch look good. Assuming success pulling those highlights down > (many raw files have some 'headroom' to do this- but no guarantees) I agree Richard and sent David my quick and dirty attempt. Regards, George Lottermoser george@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.imagist.com http://www.imagist.com/blog http://www.linkedin.com/in/imagist ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/ Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/