[LRFlex] Re: Influence of ISO on RAW capacity

From: "David Young" <telyt@xxxxxxxxx>
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 07:57:49 -0700

Thanks, Douglas! 

The varying ISO is indeed the culprit!  

FWIW, the Lexar 1 GB HS cards yield,

ISO 100         110
ISO 200         109
ISO 400         106
ISO 800         103
ISO 1600          98
ISO 3200          91

Different, but not significantly so, from the Kinston card.

I shall wonder, no longer!

Thanks again!

David.

--------
On 23/06/2005 at 12:52 AM Douglas Sharp wrote:

>David,
>here are the figures for a fresh Kingston 1GB card
>ISO 100    112
>ISO 200    111
>ISO 400    108
>ISO 800    104
>ISO 1600   100
>ISO 3200   92 (custom setting H)
>BTW, software updated to 2.0.0 also puts an extra file on to the card.
>
>Hope this helps, it does actually vary from card to card
>512 mb mostly pack 55 RAW files at ISO 100


David Young,
Logan Lake, BC    
CANADA. 

Personal Web-site at: http://www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr
Leica Reflex Forum web-page: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm

------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
    www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

References:

[LRFlex] A question for the 20D users.
From: David Young

[LRFlex] Re: A question for the 20D users.
From: Douglas Sharp

[LRFlex] Influence of ISO on RAW capacity
From: Douglas Sharp

[LRFlex] Re: Influence of ISO on RAW capacity

Other related posts: