[LRflex] Re: IMG + Opinion on edited pic invited
- From: David Young <telyt@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:19:21 -0800
At 31/01/2007, you wrote:
>May have your opinion on the three PSed versions of a single shot taken
>a couple of days ago?
>For my statistics, could you let me know your preference order (fast and
>easy) :
>
>WoS1 = Good
>WoS2 = Best
>WoS3 = Better
>
>Perhaps, time permitting, you could also let me know why - a bit more
>demanding but it would certainly help me more :-[ .
The angle of the board, on the right, in the first shot, is a
distracting element, to me.
The third shot is cropped too tight, and gives no sense of where the shot "is".
The middle one, as baby bear said, was "just right".
Nice shot! Thanks for sharing!
Cheers!
---
David Young,
Logan Lake, CANADA
Wildlife Photographs: http://www.telyt.com/
Personal Web-pages: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- Follow-Ups:
- [LRflex] Re: IMG + Opinion on edited pic invited
- From: Philippe Amard
- [LRflex] Re: IMG + Opinion + Douglas's contribution
- From: Philippe Amard
- References:
- [LRflex] IMG + Opinion on edited pic invited
- From: Philippe Amard
Other related posts:
- » [LRflex] IMG + Opinion on edited pic invited
- » [LRflex] Re: IMG + Opinion on edited pic invited
- » [LRflex] Re: IMG + Opinion on edited pic invited
- [LRflex] Re: IMG + Opinion on edited pic invited
- From: Philippe Amard
- [LRflex] Re: IMG + Opinion + Douglas's contribution
- From: Philippe Amard
- [LRflex] IMG + Opinion on edited pic invited
- From: Philippe Amard