[LRflex] Re: IMG + Opinion + Douglas's contribution

Philippe,
     Graphically, I agree Douglas' is better.  It's cleaner and well balanced.  
Emotionally I still like the original first one because 
it's disturbing.  
    But I'm often wierd.
    This is a real eye opener as to what can be done with an 
image with perspective controls, and no Deardorff required.
Cheers,
Charlie.



---- Philippe Amard <phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> Douglas Sharp has edited the picture for us.
> I thank him very much as it now looks so much more like it.
> His work can be seen here 
> <http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/Phileica/Playground/> (first image in 
> the second row)
> 
> To all, thanks again for your remarks, advice and comments.
> 
> Phlileciangemix
> 
> David Young wrote:
> 
> >
> >The angle of the board, on the right, in the first shot, is a 
> >distracting element, to me.
> >The third shot is cropped too tight, and gives no sense of where the shot 
> >"is".
> >The middle one, as baby bear said, was "just right".
> >
> >Nice shot!  Thanks for sharing!
> >
> >Cheers!
> >---
> >
> >David Young,
> >Logan Lake, CANADA
> >
> >Wildlife Photographs: http://www.telyt.com/
> >Personal Web-pages: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >------
> >Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> >    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> >Archives are at:
> >    http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>     http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> Archives are at:
>     http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
    http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: