[LRFlex] Re: How many monks could a chipmunk chip...

on 8/22/04 7:02 PM, David Young at dnr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> 
> A while back, Doug Herr offered:
> 
> a.k.a. Lodgepole Chipmunk - at least, I think so.  Kinda hard to ID some
> chipmunks w/o the skeleton in hand.
> 
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com/mammals/loch00.html
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com/mammals/loch01.html
> 
> ----
> 
> Doug:
> 
> Both excellent shots, as always.  Of the two, I much prefer the second one,
> but still wish it had a little more 'space' to the left, so that the
> chipmunk was "looking into" the photo.
> 
> Sill, knowing how hard it is to catch these critters, this is *not* a
> serious complaint!
> 
> Well done!
> ----------
> 

Thanks David.  This photo is cropped from a horizontal, so there's plenty of
space available on the slide for it to look in to.

Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com


------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
    www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
    www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: