[LRFlex] Re: Further speculation on the R-10D - sorry David
- From: "Robert Langjahr" <langjahr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 14:30:00 -0800
David said:
The Leica Historical Society of America is going through a huge internal
debate about whether to eliminate the word "historical" from their
name. If Leica continue as they are, the word may become more significant
than we think!
............................................................................
....................................
Hi David,
That debate has been resolved, at least for the time being
"Historical" will stay.
Bob
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- Follow-Ups:
- [LRFlex] Re: Further speculation on the R-10D - sorry David
- From: Bille Xavier F.
- References:
- [LRFlex] Re: Speculation on the R-10D
- From: Neil Gould
- [LRFlex] Further speculation on the R-10D
- From: David Young
- [LRFlex] Further speculation on the R-10D - sorry David
- From: Douglas M. Sharp
- [LRFlex] Re: Further speculation on the R-10D - sorry David
- From: David Young
Other related posts:
- » [LRFlex] Further speculation on the R-10D - sorry David
- » [LRFlex] Re: Further speculation on the R-10D - sorry David
- » [LRFlex] Re: Further speculation on the R-10D - sorry David
- » [LRFlex] Re: Further speculation on the R-10D - sorry David
- [LRFlex] Re: Further speculation on the R-10D - sorry David
- From: Bille Xavier F.
- [LRFlex] Re: Speculation on the R-10D
- From: Neil Gould
- [LRFlex] Further speculation on the R-10D
- From: David Young
- [LRFlex] Further speculation on the R-10D - sorry David
- From: Douglas M. Sharp
- [LRFlex] Re: Further speculation on the R-10D - sorry David
- From: David Young