[LRFlex] Re: Digital Back-up Policy
- From: Ted Grant <tedgrant@xxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 15:38:11 -0700
David Young posted:
That being said, there are the issues of format changes and, more
specifically, the problems for the millions of "happy snappers", who
record the growing up of their kids with the intentions of looking at
the photos when those same kids are much older. These folks don't have
a good backup policy, and I am afraid that if something more permanent
doesn't come along, they will lose the lot.
Perhaps I worry too much!<<<<<<<
Oh my goodness David do not create a worry line over this, as most of the
digital people happy snapping like pop corn today will not, do not, nor not
likely ever will have a thought about future family seeing pictures.
As in the old family photo albums of long gone days of yore!
It doesn't register because everything these days is quite simply... "now
and the immediate moment!" There is no tomorrow! Sure for a few, but the
majority are concerned for the immediacy of the digital image moments and
that's it.
And if this were not the case, digital wouldn't have become the new miracle
on the Christmas tree, birthday, graduation gift and any other reason one
can think for purchasing a digital camera.... It's all about the very moment
you breath!
So stop thinking about it and enjoy Logan Lake! ;-)
================================================
Then Aram Langhans added:
For me I just have to look at 30+ years of slide boxes and 3-ring binders
of B&W negative and contact sheets. Think of how many times the
technology has change over the last 20 years in data storage. I would
have had to change from floppy to Zip to CD to DVD. Just starting out it
might seem like a do-able thing, but every year you add to your photo
collection hundreds or thousands of photos. So, every time you have to
change technology, or just make a backup, the number of photos has
increased. I could envision starting with digital and after 20 years you
have to spend all your time backing up and no time taking new photos.<<<
Hi Aram,
Your post triggered me doing a rough count on colour slide file binders only
covering the past 20 years.
81 binders, 35 pages in each of 20 slides per page...... total, 56,700 :-)
Then there's approximately another 40,000 in slide boxes to be added to
pages and binders for shipment to the National Archives of Canada for the
National Photo Collection and it's enclosed Ted Grant Collection. Which
already contain more than 250,000 B&W negatives and slides covering the
first 30 years of my career.
So if you were to put that onto CD's and or DVD's it becomes a formidable
filing situation if one had to do it every few years of updating. I just
look at it this way, "It's all film and by the time I might need to think
about it. It'll be who cares? ;-)
My initial collection is frozen at 40 below zero in controlled vaults along
with Karsh's and many other photographers, Canadian and others.
And before I've built a reasonable digital image collection it wont really
matter what the heck happens as someone else will have to worry about it.
;-) However, maybe I should have second thoughts about this, as I intend on
at least making it to my 100th birthday as there maybe other wild and crazy
things I might want for a birthday gift! ;-)
Apart from this Friday 27th of May and my boyhood dream of a flight in a
P-51 Mustang! :-) Yep that's right at the young age of 76! :-) A boyhood
dream comes true!!! :-) At the Olympic Flight Museum in Olympia Washington,
USA! Take off time... 3pm. weather permitting. If not the next day.
Now that's got to be a birthday gift from heaven! :-) Me, an M7, 15mm lens
and slide film along with the Canon 20D and 10mm-22mm zoom lens. Like all
wides as there isn't any room for even a 35mm! ;-)
But in the long run as I see digital for those of us who are becoming avid
users, it means editing as hard assed as we can, saving only the very best
and dump the rest! If I've learned one thing without question shooting
digital and I say this without reservation.... "WE ALL" shoot too many
frivolous frames.
Not that the keepers are frivolous images, but we burn far more space that
are meaningless captures. Certainly compared to using film. However, we do
expose a far greater number of images of no consequence requiring a very
tough editing keeping only the cream!
It's all part of the digital world because it's so dang easy, we create our
own "image numbers monster" because it's so simple. And it doesn't cost a
penny farthing to do it.:-) But it's so much fun and exciting it's easy to
blaze away without thought of how many we're shooting! :-) Like, try a 2 Gig
card and start shooting! Yikes when you go to download to computer you can't
imagine how many there are. :-)
ted
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- Follow-Ups:
- [LRFlex] P-51 'stangs.
- From: David Young
- References:
- [LRFlex] Digital Back-up Policy
- From: Aram Langhans
Other related posts:
- » [LRFlex] Digital Back-up Policy
- » [LRFlex] Re: Digital Back-up Policy
That being said, there are the issues of format changes and, more specifically, the problems for the millions of "happy snappers", who record the growing up of their kids with the intentions of looking at the photos when those same kids are much older. These folks don't have a good backup policy, and I am afraid that if something more permanent doesn't come along, they will lose the lot.
Perhaps I worry too much!<<<<<<<
------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- [LRFlex] P-51 'stangs.
- From: David Young
- [LRFlex] Digital Back-up Policy
- From: Aram Langhans