[LRflex] DMR vs. Leicanon - a DMR owner's experience

  • From: "Peter M.C. Werner" <pwerner@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:31:59 +0200

Elliot and David,

> I look forward to more reviews.

While reviews are certainly useful, it might also be interesting, IMHO,
to learn the opinion of people who actually own and have used the DMR
for some time. What makes them opt for the DMR, how are they satisfied
in day-to-day work? I invite other DMR owners to post their experiences.
Here my own experience:


1) I have an array of R lenses and R bodies, a SL2, R8 and R9

2) A year ago I switched to serious digital with a DSLR (Fuji S2 taking
my Nikkor lenses). I was not very satisfied, especially with the dynamic
range and the color rendition. The results could not compete with my
film-based Leicas

3) Second experience: a Panasonic Lumix FZ20 with the 2.8/36-432 Leica
vario Elmarit zoom lens + image stabilizer. I loved the results in terms
of color rendition and the image stabilizer. But this Lumix has some
limitations which made me look further:

- Sharpness. Prints larger than 8x10 are not as sharp as I would like

- Viewfinder. The LCD viewfinder of the FZ20 does not allow you to
manually focus the camera with precision. While this is not a problem
using auto-focus for landscapes, people, etc. it makes it unfit for
macro photography

- Noise level too high at higher ISO settings.

4) Enter the Leicanon option. In order to use my Leica lenses I bought a
20D and adapter rings. I could now make pictures that I was satisfied
with in terms of sharpness. Big drawbacks (for my use)

- Small viewfinder making it difficult to focus with precision. 80% of
my macro photos where out of focus unless I used very small apertures
(1:16-1:32). I felt I was taken back to the 60ies and the Exactas,
before full aperture focusing and metering became available.

- Exposure was often off. At the small apertures I had to use, the TTL
exposure meter of the 20D was no longer reliable, I got a lot of under-
and overexposed pictures. Of course, you could make a test shot, look at
the histogram and then take more shots with different settings:
Complicated, time-consuming and very frustrating. In the meantime, the
bee that I was trying to capture had flown away.

- Most disturbing of all: I did not like the color rendition of the
Canon. The Panasonic FZ20 colors where much better. The Canon colors
seemed harsh and unnatural. The colors I got with the same lenses on
film where much more to my liking. Some might argue that you could
correct this in Photoshop. It took me sometimes hours of trying but the
results did not satisfy me. You can see examples of the problem on
http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00BflF

4) Next step: I booked a one-week seminar at the Leica Academy in
Germany, where I could use the DMR for a full week and compare it with
my Leicanon. Finally, full satisfaction:

- a clear viewfinder that allowed to focus with precision and see the
aperture setting in the viewfinder itself.

- Correct exposures with meter readings that were, most of the time,
right on the dot, even at high magnifications in macro work.

- Full-aperture metering: No need to change the lens aperture after
focusing

- Very user-friendly handling: No need to consult the manual (and
forget) adjustments buried in deep menu layers; simple and
straightforward to use.

- Most important of all for me: color rendition that I liked and that
compared favorably with the results I got on film.

- The sharpness was excellent, better than the 20D, but that had not
been one of my problems, I do not usually print larger than A3 (11x16)
and at that magnification, the Canon was already sharp enough.

I could buy a DMR last week and will post more experiences and pictures
with the production model on my web site, www.leicaphoto.net . At first
sight, the results are not significantly different from the
pre-production model I used in the seminars.


Peter Werner
www.leicaphoto.net



> -----Original Message-----
> From: leicareflex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:leicareflex-
> bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dr. Elliot Puritz
> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 19:12
> To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [LRflex] Re: DM-R review
>
> Hi David:
>
> Well...the review while certainly fine, is not "over the top" .  They
are
> waiting for the digital M...
>
> Frankly, I am not sure the DMR is worth the money.  Then again, I have
no
> experience with digital.  I look forward to more reviews.
>
> Thanks for the link David!
>
> Elliot
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Young" <telyt@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 11:15 AM
> Subject: [LRflex] DM-R review
>
>
> > For those interested in the DM-R, the Digital Outback has posted
their
> > "Leica DMR Experience Report."
> > David Young,
> > Logan Lake, BC
> > CANADA.
> >
> > Personal Web-site at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt
> > Leica Reflex Forum web-page: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> >
> >
> > ------
> > Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> >    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> > Archives are at:
> >    www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>     http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
> Archives are at:
>     www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/


------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
    www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: