[LRFlex] Re: Comparison shots
- From: Doug Herr <telyt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 05:50:34 -0800
on 2/24/05 10:05 PM, M7 at photo-m7@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Aram,
>
> I'm amazed at the better quality that your Leica lens had over the
> Canon, but then that 18-55 lens is a $100 price point product. You've
> inspired me to do a similar test with my 50 summicron-R, but pitted
> against a Canon 50mm f1.4. I'll post results when they're done.
>
> John
>
>
> On Feb 24, 2005, at 10:33 AM, Aram Langhans wrote:
>
>> http://www.naches.wednet.edu/NachesValley/nvhs/science/langhans/
>> compare/compare.htm
>
The prive-vs.-prime will be a much more meaningful lens comparison, yet
Aram's prime-vs.-cheap zoom comparison illustrates that even on an
inexpensive DSLR, lens quality matters!
Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- References:
- [LRFlex] Re: Comparison shots
- From: M7
Other related posts:
- » [LRFlex] Comparison shots
- » [LRFlex] Re: Comparison shots
- » [LRFlex] Re: Comparison shots
- » [LRFlex] Re: Comparison shots
- » [LRFlex] Re: Comparison shots
- » [LRFlex] Re: Comparison shots
- » [LRFlex] Re: Comparison shots
- » [LRFlex] Re: Comparison shots
- » [LRFlex] Re: Comparison shots
- » [LRFlex] Re: Comparison shots
- » [LRFlex] Re: Comparison shots
- » [LRFlex] Re: Comparison shots
- [LRFlex] Re: Comparison shots
- From: M7