Steve Barbour wrote: > > What??? No M8, yet??? ;-) > >I have had one for about 6-7 months... That's what I thought... so what's with the M7? You LIKE paying for film? ;-) On a serious note, where there's lots of light, I still prefer film... it has a detail, even when scanned (@ 4000 dpi) that my digitals cannot match. And you certainly had lots of light! Though as Doug points out, in low light (high ISO) situations, digi does better. And because, like Doug, I do a lot of slow lens/deep shade stuff, I'll likely never go back to film. Film or digi, you're still one helluva shooter. Thanks for sharing. Cheers! --- David Young, Logan Lake, CANADA Wildlife Photographs: http://www.telyt.com/ Personal Web-pages: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt Stock Photography at: http://tinyurl.com/2amll4 ------ Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm Archives are at: //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/