[LRflex] Re: Camera Choice Advice Sought
- From: Chris L <speleo_karst@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:08:06 -0700 (PDT)
----- Original Message ----
From: Kevin Willey <kevinwilley@xxxxxx>
To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 3:15:09 AM
Subject: [LRflex] Camera Choice Advice Sought
Also, love the process of shooting MF with Hassi but I want a travel camera and
long zoom options and a backup body. Rather than go the M8.2 as I originally
intended and then have to invest in a M lens line, I am considering a second R8
or R9 body. Yet the R6.2 tempts me because of reputation, size, all mechanical
so I can keep it a long time w/o worrying about electronic parts to repair R8
or R9. Do I lose noticeable image quality with a less capable metering,
programming system in R6.2 versus R8/9? There is currently a new 6.2 on eBay
for $1,700.
________________________
As Doug mentioned, depending on your preferences, subjects and situations,
there is no reason for a manual exposure camera to produce worse images than an
R8 or R9.
The cameras of the R4-R7 series will be lighter than what you now have (I have
an R4, which has been very reliable, despite its reputation. The only reason I
might upgrade it is to get 1/2000).
The problem remains that, for a travel camera, the R lenses themselves are
bloody heavy!
So when walking/backpacking long distances, I'll usually take my M6 (the body
itself isn't that light, but the lenses are, as well as being tiny) or my
Rolleiflex SLR (also has a lineup of very small, light & good lenses).
For 1700$ you can get lots of camera, including a basic M kit!
In any case, cameras like the R4 are so cheap now, that if an electronic
component does fail, you just get another one (horrible consumerism, yes...)
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts: