[LRflex] Re: Brule
- From: David Young <telyt@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 10:26:43 -0700
At 20/10/2007, you wrote:
David Young <telyt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/Brule.htm
>
Do you have a version of this photo w/o the tree on the left? I
find it detracts from an otherwise gorgeous photo because it's so out of focus.
Hi Doug!
Sadly, no. I tried to crop it, but if cropped enough to eliminate
the tree, so much of the "fall colours" are lost that the shot does
not look like much more than the usual shot of an ordinary mountain.
Of course, here is also a difference of opinion. I felt the tree
gave the shot a sense of "depth". However, that's just me, and I
admit to being a "wee bit" odd!
From where I took the shot, it was not possible to get a clear shot,
without the tree ... in fact, this is the minimal amount of
foreground tree from three different shots, taken in the nearby area.
Sigh....
Here is a square crop, which does what you want, but it doesn't "turn
my crank".
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/Brule2.htm
Thanks for looking and taking the time to comment.
---
David Young,
Logan Lake, CANADA
Wildlife Photographs: http://www.telyt.com/
Personal Web-pages: http://www3.telus.net/~telyt
Stock Photography at: http://tinyurl.com/2amll4
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
