[LRflex] Re: Anyone using Angenieux converted to N... over here?
- From: "Axel Collier" <axel.collier@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 11:20:00 +0100
WOW Philippe
THANK YOU so very much for your time and the interesting information !!!
I mean a summicron.
IF i buy a 50mm for my R3, it will be Leica noting else.
who is happy with the 35-70mm f4 ? Anything else in this range ?
Compared to the summicron 50mm ? (talking image quality, off course, it is a
zoom as i know ;-) )
thank you all
greetings, Axel
----- Original Message -----
From: "philippe.amard" <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>
To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 9:42 AM
Subject: [LRflex] Re: Anyone using Angenieux converted to N... over here?
> the 35 x 2 is a f2.5-3.5
>
> I have not compared it to the latest equivalent in the Leica range
>
> the 70 x 3 is sharper, mine at least, and I had swapped my former
> Leitz 70-210 f.4 for it, for the much better.
>
> I'm afraid that's all I can tell you in terms of comparison.
>
> Of course, you've got to like its 'coloration' and a now somewhat
> kinky plastic body ...
> David had tried mine on the DMR combo - the light was poor and it
> could have performed better I think.
> Also there was that crop factor, and one of the Angies assets in the
> 70s were their ability to hold light without flare, DK how it compares
> using modern standards, and excellent bokeh (still true).
>
> 50 : Are you referring to a summicron or lux?
> They're most excellent it goes without saying
> or to the Angie 50mm which I don't think was ever produced in N mount,
> but I may be wrong - I think Exakta was the target of the retrofocus
> model
> here's a page on a 50 adapted for an M
> http://www.cameracollection.net/angenieux50mmf0.95
>
>
>
> Just found a photo of the Leitz order - made FOR Leitz ... (1969 -
> Leicaflex)
> http://www.summilux.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=6632
>
> @+
> Ph
>
>
>
> Le 12 janv. 11 à 08:50, Axel Collier a écrit :
>
>>
>> hi philippe (or anybody else?)
>> how much do you like your 35x2
>> i might be looking for a walk around lens for my R3
>> can you compare to your 70x3
>> or to other Leica zooms you used or own ?
>> I consider the 35-70mm f4 for example.
>> or should i just buy a 50mm ?
>> greetings, Axel
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "philippe.amard" <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>
>> To: <leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 8:22 AM
>> Subject: [LRflex] Re: Anyone using Angenieux converted to N... over
>> here?
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Le 12 janv. 11 à 01:53, Richard Ward a écrit :
>>>
>>>> B) What the -bleep- is the rationale behind Angenieux using that
>>>> nomenclature
>>>> methodology?
>>>
>>> More on this here
>>> http://www.angenieux.com/zoom-lenses/index.php?txt=112
>>>
>>> Timeline there
>>> http://www.angenieux.com/file/aboutus/historique.pdf
>>>
>>> Ph
>>>
>>>
>>> ------
>>> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>>> http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
>>> Archives are at:
>>> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>>
>> ------
>> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>> http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
>> Archives are at:
>> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>>
>
>
> ------
> Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
> http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
> Archives are at:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
http://www.lrflex.furnfeather.net/
Archives are at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
Other related posts:
