[LRflex] Re: Angenieux lenses for Leica R mount

More Angenieux photos:

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/267995/257
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/267995/184
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/267995/181
http://www.leica-camera.com/discus_e/messages/11/144420.html?1120116778

Peter
www.leicaphoto.net

>-- Original-Nachricht --
>Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 01:16:49 +0100
>From: pwerner@xxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [LRflex] Re: Angenieux lenses for Leica R mount
>To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Reply-To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>Hi,
>
>I have all the ones that were made in Leica R mount: 2.5/45-90 2.3/35-70
>3.5/70-210 and 2.3/180 Apo.
>
>I am very satisfied with the 70-210, which I have had for some time and
used
>mainly on the R9+DMR. You can see some of the pictures I took with it on
>my web site, http://www.leicaphoto.net/discus/messages/7/7.html?1130732384.
>The following were made with Angenieux lenses:
>
>- Sunrise on the Abtsee
>- Comparison 35-70 lenses
>- Salzburg Roofs on a Rainy Afternoon
>- Hellbrunn Castle 2
>
>Best regards
>Peter Werner
>http://www.leicaphoto.net
>
>>-- Original-Nachricht --
>>Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 01:01:25 +0100
>>From: Philippe AMARD <phamard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: [LRflex] Re: Angenieux zoom lenses for Leica R mount
>>Reply-To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>Hi!
>>
>>I own a 35/70 macro Angénieux zoom which I use with the R3 or the
>>R4.
>>The results are what I've always looked for in a zoom lense - no
>>vigneting, no distortion, a sharpness I never got with non-zoom
>>lenses of other brands (olympus, nikon, pentax, canon plus
>>others I want to forget)
>>It was and still is a jewel - I don't know if it can be adapted
>>to the canonDspecies - I'd love it to...
>>
>>I could post some (unfortunately badly) scanned snaps to you you
>>liked me to.
>>
>>I've been looking for a 70/210 for a few months now to replace my
>>Leica 70/210 but prices are still a handicap and unfortunately
>>the last sellers on Ebay didn't take Paypal, that's also why I
>>can't speak of it from experience. But I will, well, erm, some
>>day I hope not to remote at least.
>>
>>Last remarks : 
>>a) macro is a bit far fetched as the range is definitely up to
>>the standard of other (and more recent) lenses.
>>b) both zooms look and feel "kinky?" when compared to Leica
>>mechanics and materials - but the glass is Baccarat glass
>>indeed.
>>
>>Wish you the best in your quest.
>>Phileica 
>>
>>PS: there's one for sale on ebay (in new zealand if I remember
>>well) - AF for Canon if anyone is interested
>>
>>------
>>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>>    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
>>Archives are at:
>>    www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
>
>------
>Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
>    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
>Archives are at:
>    www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
    http://www3.telus.net/~telyt/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
    www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/

Other related posts: