[LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- From: David Young <dnr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leicareflex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:20:15 -0800
Dave Saalsaa wrote:
You need to throw Kodak into that mix too. My source at Kodak said a few
months ago that the DM-R wasn't going to reach the consumer. Mostly
because of Leica's financial situation. Kodak is also haveing problems
and cannot afford to fund the DM-R project if Leica is not going to pay them.
Dave
If true, this is truly sad. For Leica have 'bet the farm' on the DM-R. If
it gets kiboshed before reaching market, their R&D money will be
unrecoverable. Given Leica's financial position, that could be a body blow. :(
----------
David Young, | égalité, liberté,
Victoria, CANADA | fraternité et Beaujolais.
Personal Web-site at:
http://www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr
Leica Reflex Forum web-page:
http://www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
------
Unsubscribe or change to/from Digest Mode at:
www.horizon.bc.ca/~dnr/lrflex.htm
Archives are at:
www.freelists.org/archives/leicareflex/
- References:
- [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- From: David Young
- [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- From: Doug Herr
- [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- From: David Young
- [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- From: Dave Saalsaa
Other related posts:
- » [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- » [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- » [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- » [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- » [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- » [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- » [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- » [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- » [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- » [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- » [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- » [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- » [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- » [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
Dave
- [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- From: David Young
- [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- From: Doug Herr
- [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- From: David Young
- [LRFlex] Re: 20D?
- From: Dave Saalsaa