RE: Studio shot?
- From: "Geoff Hopkinson" <hoppyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2008 08:22:44 +1000
I agree with Doug. I would add that it otherwise does look like a posed
portrait, almost too perfect and maybe a little static. By the way, not to
pick on Oly but a worthwhile comment on AF, I think; have you seen the print
ad for the E-3 that is a close up of a painted face? The focus misses the
eyes and has the painted skin sharp? Maybe a deliberate tactic? Bothers the
heck out of me though.
Cheers
Geoff
http://www.pbase.com/hoppyman/e
http://gallery.leica-users.org/v/gh/
-----Original Message-----
Subject: Re: Studio shot?
David Young <dsy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>Here is a portrait which, I think, looks like it could pass for a
>studio portrait. But, it's not.
>
>http://www.furnfeather.net/Temps/SQNZ.htm
>
>Comments, criticism, appreciated, as always.
>
For me the point of focus is a problem, otherwise this would be a fine
portrait. Well done considering the circumstances.
Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in
the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to
per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Studio shot? (further thoughts)
- From: David Young
- References:
- Re: Studio shot?
- From: wildlightphoto
Other related posts:
- » Studio shot?
- » Re: Studio shot?
- » Re: Studio shot?
- » Re: Studio shot?
- » RE: Studio shot?
- » RE: Studio shot?
- RE: Studio shot? (further thoughts)
- From: David Young
- Re: Studio shot?
- From: wildlightphoto