Re: Sharpening 'Dickie' bird...
- From: Mark Bohrer <lurchl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:12:07 -0700
Maybe I'm a perfectionist but if a picture doesn't look sharp to begin with
I delete it - no sense polishing a turd - and move on to sharper, better
exposed and composed images with more promise. That approach saves me a lot
of time in Photoshop. Sometimes I experiment with images from new equipment
or new techniques but I'm usually after stuff I can submit to editors.
David, your finch image probably was reasonably sharp to start with.
BTW, what's new in Victoria with you and Rose?
At 12:43 PM 8/23/2004, you wrote:
I am far from being a PS maven but I have learned that sharpening is one
of he real Error Areas.
IF a picture seems a bit soft overall I first make a duplicate layer and
sharpen about 30-35%.
I do adjustments in layers too, then merge them down.
I am not good enough yet to sharpen particular areas of an image tho this
can be done with layer masks. I just gotta figure out how to do that.
BUT the more you sharpen the more you create noise. Sometimes it is "good:
noise cause it looks like film grain, so a digital pic can gain more
"character"
Oh yeah, once you have an image you like at a size you like in 300 dpi for
printing there;'s no reason not to post it to the web that size. But if
you want to go 100 dpi (worried about having too large a file) I'd dupe
the image in PS and (leaving it alone at 300 dpi ) resize it to the
screen-sized image you want. It might look better that way. I put all my
images into i-photo and then send them email -- where it defaults to 640
pixels wide-- or put them on the home page albums which seem to cause
no-one any problems at the viewing end. But I like my digitalization simple.
You now have my sum total of knowledge re PS and sharpening and computer
graphics, too,
Mike
Mark Bohrer
www.mountain-and-desert.com
Adventure travel and wildlife photography
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in
the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to
per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sharpening 'Dickie' bird...
- From: David Young
- References:
- Re: Another 'Dickie' bird...
- From: David Young
- Re: Sharpening 'Dickie' bird...
- From: Michael Levy
Other related posts:
- » Re: Sharpening 'Dickie' bird...
- » Re: Sharpening 'Dickie' bird...
- » Re: Sharpening 'Dickie' bird...
- » Re: Sharpening 'Dickie' bird...
IF a picture seems a bit soft overall I first make a duplicate layer and sharpen about 30-35%.
I do adjustments in layers too, then merge them down.
I am not good enough yet to sharpen particular areas of an image tho this can be done with layer masks. I just gotta figure out how to do that.
BUT the more you sharpen the more you create noise. Sometimes it is "good: noise cause it looks like film grain, so a digital pic can gain more "character"
Oh yeah, once you have an image you like at a size you like in 300 dpi for printing there;'s no reason not to post it to the web that size. But if you want to go 100 dpi (worried about having too large a file) I'd dupe the image in PS and (leaving it alone at 300 dpi ) resize it to the screen-sized image you want. It might look better that way. I put all my images into i-photo and then send them email -- where it defaults to 640 pixels wide-- or put them on the home page albums which seem to cause no-one any problems at the viewing end. But I like my digitalization simple.
You now have my sum total of knowledge re PS and sharpening and computer graphics, too,
Mike
========================================================= To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
- Re: Sharpening 'Dickie' bird...
- From: David Young
- Re: Another 'Dickie' bird...
- From: David Young
- Re: Sharpening 'Dickie' bird...
- From: Michael Levy