Re: Pix not sharp nor digital
- From: Martin Howard <mvhoward@xxxxxxx>
- To: leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 11:34:41 -0800
Mark Bohrer wrote:
Hitchcock was a class act, a great filmmaker who chose excellent
talent for classics like Rear Window. Today's directors and producers
create mostly gratuitous trash.
Not to take anything away from the considerably talent and skill of
Hitchcock, but I'm sure that in his day the majority of the directors
and producers created mostly gratuitous trash too. Our perception of
what has become gratuitous changes over time. That, and the fact that
most of the gratuitous trash doesn't survive, makes comparing the
greats of a past time with everything that is going on in the current
one becomes a problematic endeavour.
Even when Cartier-Bresson shot slightly risque stuff he did so in
classy style to communicate an idea.
Cartier-Bresson's "risque" stuff leaves me pretty cold. I love HCB's
photography but I don't feel that it communicates much beyond a very
strong style of visual aesthetics, a style that has since been picked
up and carried on most notably by Sebastiao Salgado (but others too).
It is characterized by an almost total divorce of aesthetics from
content -- which in and of itself can be read as a very astute
commentary on social values in the post-modern age, but I doubt that in
HCB's case it was that conscientious (in Salgado's earlier work,
possibly more so). HCB appears to have approached photography almost
as an exercise in geometry. Again, I state this not to detract from
his talent, artistry, skill, or influence on photography, but merely
because I like calling a spoon a spoon.
It is interesting to compare HCB with Jeanloup Sieff. With regard to
"risque" subject matter, I find Sieff's ability to communicate an idea
far exceeds that of HCB.
M.
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in
the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to
per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Pix not sharp nor digital
- From: Jeffery Smith
- Re:Was Pix not sharp nor digital now Salgado
- From: Bill Lawlor
- References:
- Re: Pix not sharp nor digital
- From: Carlos Morales Mengotti
- RE: Pix not sharp nor digital
- From: Jeffery Smith
- RE: Pix not sharp nor digital
- From: Mark Bohrer
Other related posts:
- » Pix not sharp nor digital
- » Re: Pix not sharp nor digital
- » Re: Pix not sharp nor digital
- » RE: Pix not sharp nor digital
- » Re: Pix not sharp nor digital
- » Re: Pix not sharp nor digital
- » RE: Pix not sharp nor digital
- » RE: Pix not sharp nor digital
- » Re: Pix not sharp nor digital
- » RE: Pix not sharp nor digital
- » RE: Pix not sharp nor digital
- » Re: Pix not sharp nor digital
- » Re: Pix not sharp nor digital
========================================================= To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
- RE: Pix not sharp nor digital
- From: Jeffery Smith
- Re:Was Pix not sharp nor digital now Salgado
- From: Bill Lawlor
- Re: Pix not sharp nor digital
- From: Carlos Morales Mengotti
- RE: Pix not sharp nor digital
- From: Jeffery Smith
- RE: Pix not sharp nor digital
- From: Mark Bohrer