Re: PAWs 3 and 4
- From: Bob Adler <rgacpa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 16:05:06 -0800 (PST)
Well.....
You caught me ;-)
For some reason, when I shoot color, I don't think in
B&W so I don't "see" in B&W. Don't know if this makes
sense, but it's just what happens.
Also, TriX is so easy, pushes so well and is so
inexpensive relative to E6. TriX @ $2 - $3 for 36exp +
$6.00 for dev. vs E6 @ $4 - $6 for 36 + $10
processing; over time it adds up.
And if I took the time to stain-develop, I'd probably
get better scans than having my local store process it
for me (the TriX, that is).
The truth is I think I'm just ambivalent :-)
boB or Bob (can't decide which :-) )
--- Jim Brick <jim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I didn't think you used B&W
> film any more though? I
> thought you decided that converting color neg to B&W
> in Photoshop was
> better than real B&W film.
>
> ?
>
> jiM
=====
Bob Adler
Palo Alto, CA
http://www.raflexions.com
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in
the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to
per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
- References:
- Re: PAWs 3 and 4
- From: Jim Brick
Other related posts:
- » PAWs 3 and 4
- » Re: PAWs 3 and 4
- » Re: PAWs 3 and 4
- » Re: PAWs 3 and 4
- » Re: PAWs 3 and 4
- Re: PAWs 3 and 4
- From: Jim Brick