Re: Leica - starter camera
- From: Nathan Wajsman <nathan.wajsman@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 10:25:46 +0200
Phil,
I second those who have recommended an M6. It came in a few variations:
- the original, starting 1984, was non-TTL and had 0.72 viewfinder
magnification
- in the late 1990s, models with 0.58 and 0.85 (the latter sometimes
called HM for High Magnification) appeared, to accomodate those who shot
mostly with wide lenses (28mm/35mm) or long ones (90mm/135mm),
respectively. The magnification is marked in very small letters on the
grey strip under the viewfinder window. The 0.85 lacks framelines for
the 28mm lens.
- also in the late 1990s, the TTL models appeared. The easiest way to
tell them apart is a slightly different script type and a larger shutter
speed dial.
Any of these will serve you well. I have recently converted to mainly
digital shooting, but the one Leica M I kept is a 0.85 non-TTL M6.
More recent models include the M7 which features an electronic shutter
and aperture priority, and the MP which is basically an M6 but with a
higher price and stupid rewind crank a la the 1960s. I would stay away
from those unless someone offers you one at a knock-down price.
The older models (M3, M4) are OK too, but aside from the fiddlier
loading system, they lack the light meter, and, being much older than an
M6, are more likely to need a CLA. Especially with an M3, you would not
be saving very much, if anything at all, compared to a recent M6.
And finally, any Leica M lens will fit any Leica M camera (with some
minor exceptions for wide angles on the M5, but I would not recommend
that one in any event).
Nathan
Phil McOrmond wrote:
So the M6 is easier to load and is a relatively new model.. The other
difference is TTL vs non-TTL. I assume the later models have the TTL.
Is there any sub-model designation for the TTL.
I have read about the older models now and the loading does seem like a
bit more trouble but no worse than loading a medium format camera as far
as I can see. I have an old Kodak Autographic from around WW1 that uses
a similar loading system to the Leica. Unforunately 127 film is not too
common although I do have some.
I think I could put up with either system of loading. Is there a
differnce in the lenses or are thay interchangeable across the model
range? The lens designations are relatively complex. How many camera
companies actually give their lenses names and not just let them be
known by their f-stop and focal length?
This is starting to get more nteresting as I go along but it sounds like
an M6 might be the one. Are there models to avoid other than due to
rarity/expense? I am not sure I would want to be regularly using
anything costing more than a couple of thousand outside of the house YMMV.
Thanks for the feedback so far.
Phil
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeffery Smith" <jls@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 7:12 PM
Subject: RE: Leica - starter camera
There is something intangible that I like better about the non-TTL. Is
it a tiny bit less tall?
Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA
http://www.400tx.com
-----Original Message-----
From: leica-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:leica-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Rei Shinozuka
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 8:58 PM
To: leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Leica - starter camera
i think the m6 in any of its guises is a good camera, and in the past
couple of years, prices have drifted into the $1,250 to $1,500 range.
the m6 is relatively new (it was made for about 20 years starting
from 1984), has built-in metering, and there are many on the used
market.
i personally like the proportions and handling of the m6 classic, but
the
m6 TTL is also a nice camera.
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then
receive MUST be replied to per instructions. You may also log in to the
Web interface to unsubscribe.
--
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands
General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com
Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com
Stock photography: http://www.alamy.com/search-results.asp?qt=wajsman
http://myloupe.com/home/found_photographer.php?photographer=507
Prints for sale: http://www.photodeluge.com
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in
the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to
per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Leica - starter camera
- From: Douglas M. Sharp
- Re: Leica - starter camera
- From: Feli
- Re: Leica - starter camera
- From: Mark Bohrer
- Re[2]: Leica - starter camera
- From: Harrison McClary
- References:
- RE: Leica - starter camera
- From: Jeffery Smith
- Re: Leica - starter camera
- From: Phil McOrmond
Other related posts:
- » Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » RE: Leica - starter camera
- » RE: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » RE: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » RE: Leica - starter camera
- » RE: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » RE: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » RE: Leica - starter camera
- » RE: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » RE: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
- » Re: Leica - starter camera
I have read about the older models now and the loading does seem like a bit more trouble but no worse than loading a medium format camera as far as I can see. I have an old Kodak Autographic from around WW1 that uses a similar loading system to the Leica. Unforunately 127 film is not too common although I do have some.
I think I could put up with either system of loading. Is there a differnce in the lenses or are thay interchangeable across the model range? The lens designations are relatively complex. How many camera companies actually give their lenses names and not just let them be known by their f-stop and focal length?
This is starting to get more nteresting as I go along but it sounds like an M6 might be the one. Are there models to avoid other than due to rarity/expense? I am not sure I would want to be regularly using anything costing more than a couple of thousand outside of the house YMMV.
Thanks for the feedback so far.
Phil
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeffery Smith" <jls@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 7:12 PM
Subject: RE: Leica - starter camera
There is something intangible that I like better about the non-TTL. Is it a tiny bit less tall?
Jeffery Smith New Orleans, LA http://www.400tx.com
-----Original Message----- From: leica-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:leica-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rei Shinozuka Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 8:58 PM To: leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Leica - starter camera
i think the m6 in any of its guises is a good camera, and in the past couple of years, prices have drifted into the $1,250 to $1,500 range. the m6 is relatively new (it was made for about 20 years starting from 1984), has built-in metering, and there are many on the used market. i personally like the proportions and handling of the m6 classic, but the m6 TTL is also a nice camera.
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
-- Nathan Wajsman Almere, The Netherlands
- Re: Leica - starter camera
- From: Douglas M. Sharp
- Re: Leica - starter camera
- From: Feli
- Re: Leica - starter camera
- From: Mark Bohrer
- Re[2]: Leica - starter camera
- From: Harrison McClary
- RE: Leica - starter camera
- From: Jeffery Smith
- Re: Leica - starter camera
- From: Phil McOrmond