Re: LTM factory conversions.
- From: "Christopher Williams" <leicachris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:36:30 -0500
It's possible the Elmar started out non-coupled then converted when the
camera was converted. Those are from 1930. Is the infinity lock at 11
o'clock(before 1932) or 7 o'clock(1932 and up)?
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Hurst"
Subject: Re: LTM factory conversions.
> OTOH Chris Williams kindly dated the lens to the early 1930s from his
> sources, so presumably what I read is wrong.
>
> Fascinating!
>
> Best
>
> Alex
> --
.
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in
the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to
per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LTM factory conversions.
- From: Christopher Williams
- Re: LTM factory conversions.
- From: Alex Hurst
- References:
- Re: LTM factory conversions.
- From: GREG LORENZO
- Re: LTM factory conversions.
- From: Alex Hurst
Other related posts:
- » LTM factory conversions.
- » Re: LTM factory conversions.
- » Re: LTM factory conversions.
- » Re: LTM factory conversions.
- » Re: LTM factory conversions.
- » Re: LTM factory conversions.
- » Re: LTM factory conversions.
- » Re: LTM factory conversions.
- » Re: LTM factory conversions.
- » Re: LTM factory conversions.
- » Re: LTM factory conversions.
- » Re: LTM factory conversions.
- Re: LTM factory conversions.
- From: Christopher Williams
- Re: LTM factory conversions.
- From: Alex Hurst
- Re: LTM factory conversions.
- From: GREG LORENZO
- Re: LTM factory conversions.
- From: Alex Hurst