Re: Horny sheep? (no pun intended) - resend with changed urls
- From: Mark Bohrer <lurchl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:18:45 -0700
Doug:
I got an additional shot of the pika hiding in a rock 'hole' that
overexposes the surrounding rock while slightly underexposing the pika. I
didn't like its background and exposure at all so I didn't post it, and
only posted the first shot to give the complete story. I agree its
background is over-colorful and distracting. He was being very secretive
and poked his head up for what seemed liked a nanosecond after that first
image before skittering into hiding so I missed the 'heads-up' shot. That's
why there's no full-profile image against a nicely-blurred background.
And I was distracted by the golden-mantled ground squirrels foraging pretty
openly nearby so I ended up concentrating on them. There are three or four
more good ground squirrel poses I didn't post.
It's difficult when you realize you need to get more images for a story
you're thinking about doing and the shooting site is a 5-plus hour drive
you just made to get back home. I cut the trip a day short due to problems
with a 4th Generation Designs gimabal tripod head (like Wimberley) that
tended to flex and vibrate too much for sharp shots. (It's great being able
to check sharpness on the computer right after shooting with digital.) The
M-262 head is very light but too flexy. I returned it for a full credit and
ordered a slightly heavier M-363 instead.
At 12:29 PM 9/20/2004, you wrote:
on 9/20/04 10:56 AM, Mark Bohrer at lurchl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Note also the pika's refiling with hares due to its presence in family
> lagomorpha. For those using Digital Pro 3 note the program wants you to
file
> pikas with voles and shrews
Pardon my attitude but what dolt programming Digital Pro 3 lumped a
lagomorph and a rodent and an insectivore together? Taxonomically it makes
ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE.
>
http://www.mountain-and-desert.com/Wildlife/Mammals/Hares/DML-HS-PK0001-5.htm
Mark, I think the pika photo misses the mark (oops, pun not intended).
Partly because its face is mostly hidden behind a rock, and partly because
the detail and color in the rocks overpowers the pika. I know that pikas
are tough little critters to photograph:
http://www.wildlightphoto.com/mammals/pika.jpg
http://www.wildlightphoto.com/mammals/pika01.jpg
Can you fill us in on the circumstances? I know you've done better work; I
suspect you didn't have much time available to spend with the pika.
Doug Herr
Birdman of Sacramento
http://www.wildlightphoto.com
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then
receive MUST be replied to per instructions. You may also log in to the
Web interface to unsubscribe.
Mark Bohrer
www.mountain-and-desert.com
Adventure travel and wildlife photography
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in
the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to
per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Horny sheep? (no pun intended) - resend with changed urls
- From: Mark Bohrer
- Re: Horny sheep? (no pun intended) - resend with changed urls
- From: Doug Herr
Other related posts:
- » Horny sheep? (no pun intended) - resend with changed urls
- » Re: Horny sheep? (no pun intended) - resend with changed urls
- » Re: Horny sheep? (no pun intended) - resend with changed urls
- » Re: Horny sheep? (no pun intended) - resend with changed urls
- » Re: Horny sheep? (no pun intended) - resend with changed urls
- » Re: Horny sheep? (no pun intended) - resend with changed urls
on 9/20/04 10:56 AM, Mark Bohrer at lurchl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Note also the pika's refiling with hares due to its presence in family
> lagomorpha. For those using Digital Pro 3 note the program wants you to file
> pikas with voles and shrews
Pardon my attitude but what dolt programming Digital Pro 3 lumped a lagomorph and a rodent and an insectivore together? Taxonomically it makes ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE.
> http://www.mountain-and-desert.com/Wildlife/Mammals/Hares/DML-HS-PK0001-5.htm
Mark, I think the pika photo misses the mark (oops, pun not intended). Partly because its face is mostly hidden behind a rock, and partly because the detail and color in the rocks overpowers the pika. I know that pikas are tough little critters to photograph:
http://www.wildlightphoto.com/mammals/pika.jpg http://www.wildlightphoto.com/mammals/pika01.jpg
Can you fill us in on the circumstances? I know you've done better work; I suspect you didn't have much time available to spend with the pika.
Doug Herr Birdman of Sacramento http://www.wildlightphoto.com
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
========================================================= To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
- Horny sheep? (no pun intended) - resend with changed urls
- From: Mark Bohrer
- Re: Horny sheep? (no pun intended) - resend with changed urls
- From: Doug Herr