Re: Epson 2200 printing and Re: Digital RF cameras
- From: Michael Levy <yvel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2004 14:34:08 -0400
I prefer Epson S041260 A3 matte paper for its heavier weight and
higher white/brightness and opacity ratings, but it's smaller
Me too- I use it for all my printing on an Epson 1270...
The egret, BTW is a marvelous snap and i hope everyone who comes into
WBU buys a copy an d makes you rich and famous.
As for the Digilux 2-- I'm just curious... Even $1,500 for a digital
camera now -- or &2,500 for another Leica M-- is pretty damn rich as my
cameras still all function perfectly.
I suspect tho when i go to a "new" (or newer) camera it will be a
digital as I find I'm already shooting film for scanning, and I may as
well go all the way. I just want controls and handling that's more like
a film camera -- preferably one *I* MUST adjust (rather than auto
everything, or dial-in-the--type-of-scene types) which no-one right
now is actually offering...
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
- References:
- Epson 2200 printing and Re: Digital RF cameras
- From: Mark Bohrer
Other related posts:
- » Epson 2200 printing and Re: Digital RF cameras
- » Re: Epson 2200 printing and Re: Digital RF cameras
- » Re: Epson 2200 printing and Re: Digital RF cameras
I prefer Epson S041260 A3 matte paper for its heavier weight and higher white/brightness and opacity ratings, but it's smaller
- Epson 2200 printing and Re: Digital RF cameras
- From: Mark Bohrer