Re: [CVUG] Epson R-D1 review
- From: Karen Nakamura <mail@xxxxxxxx>
- To: CVUG <cvug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 06:28:27 +0800
http://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/docs/2004/0621/dcr016.htm
I'm in Shanghai right now, so this is just a quick and dirty summary:
* Seiko Epson is famous for its printers but the larger Epson group
has also been making computers as well as being an early participant
in digital cameras.
* They produced models such as the CP-200/500 but then had apparently
retreated from the digital camera market.
* But together with Cosina, they have re-entered the high-end digital
camera market
* It looks like the Bessa R2, but is actually entirely new in the inside.
* The "EM" mount is compatible with the Leica M mount and the Leica S
mount with an adapter
* The lenses I used for this test were the Color Skopar 21f/4, 28
f/3.,5 35 f/2.5 PII, 50 f/2.,5 , and 75 f/2.5. Also the C-V Nokton 50
f/1.5, and Ricoh GR 21 f/3.,5 and 28 f/2.8.
* I was not permitted to shoot in JPEG mode, only the RAW mode by Epson
* I used the included Photolier v.1.0.1 software to convert to JPEG
* I did not modify the white balance or other settings
* [skip all the camera feature description since we know that]
* WIth the 21mm f/4, I should note that many digital cameras suffer
from "front focusing error" (where the AF focuses slightly to the
front of the image plane. The R-D1 focused accurately at full
aperture, using its full baselength of 38.2mm. The 1.0x
magnification finder was nice.
[see photos 1a and 2a of two buildings with cloudy sky; 21mm f/4, ISO 200]
* The image on the left is full aperture. The image improved
stopping down to f/5.6 (right side). However, you may note that the
window blinds on the edges of the frame exhibit some color fringing.
This appears to be worse than other digital cameras. There is also
some light falloff, but that is caused by the lens.
* [photos 2a 2b : 28mm f/3.5 full aperture and then stopped down to
f/5.6] There is still color fringing on the f/5.6 photo
* [ 3a/3b: 35mm f/2.5 full aperture and stopped down to f/5.6]
* [4a/4b: 50mm f/2.5 full aperture and stopped down to f/5.6]
* I did not increase the sharpness in the RAW images or otherwise
manipulate them. The color fringing was the only objectionable issue
that I could find.
* This uses the SONY imaging CCD found in other cameras, but the
image "flavor" produced by the chip appears different.
* 5a/5b: 75mm f/2.5 full and f/5.6
* 6a/6b: Noise reduction ON (left) and OFF (right)
* Using the 75mm lens, you have to be very careful or it is easy to
misfocus (photo 7; AE+1)
* AWB seems excellent (8a = AWB, 8b = Daylight)
* 9a = AWB, 9b = tungsten
* 10a = AWB, 10b = florescent
*11a = ISO 200; 11b = ISO 400, 11c = ISO 800
* 12 = ISO 1600
* This is not just a simple point and shoot camera, but one where the
photographer must pay attention to it. In one sense ,its more
complicated than a digital SLR. But those photographers who have
confidence in themselves should give it a shot.
--
Karen Nakamura
http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in
the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to
per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: [CVUG] Epson R-D1 review
- From: Barry Fisher
Other related posts:
- » Re: [CVUG] Epson R-D1 review
- » RE: [CVUG] Epson R-D1 review
- » RE: [CVUG] Epson R-D1 review
- » RE: [CVUG] Epson R-D1 review
-- Karen Nakamura http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/
- RE: [CVUG] Epson R-D1 review
- From: Barry Fisher