Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- From: "Bill Lawlor" <wvl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 21:56:52 -0700
Oh Ted! Oh Canada! Do I have to be reasonable "aboot" everything. Yes it was
on automatic. You might be right but if I want that I have a nice fifty
dollar Canonet 28 that will do nice 16X24s untill the mercury battery runs
down. And it's made out of metal. I have nothing against modern cameras. I
have more great shots with my Ricoh GR1 than my M3. But to put the name of
Leica on that toy is what you would expect from a company that makes purses!
Grumble..grumble..
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@xxxxxxx>
To: <leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 5:02 PM
Subject: Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
> Bill Lawlor came out shooting at the Digilux 2! ;-)
> Subject: Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
>
> >>He passed the solid state wonder to me. I found it difficult to
> > maintain my friendly composure and nearly was unable to resist a cry of
> > merde! The Digilux seemed like a cheap plastic toy compared to the heft
>
> of the M3. The electronic viewfinder was a cruel joke.
>
> > A toy telescope > would run circles around that grainy little window. I
> can't > believe the Digilux has been widely praised by M owners. The only
> digital > camera I have used is the Canon 300D. IMO, a much more serious
> > camera than that silly digi.
> > Donning my flameproof suit and helmet,<<<<<<<<
>
> Now Bill the flame suit wont help other than holding the pieces together
> after the flames are out! ;-) You know the dust, ashes and debris! ;-)
>
> You see this is the worst way to try a camera, someone else's standing in
a
> crowd without having the instruction manual in hand to make any simple
> adjustments to the view finder to make it fit "your eye!" And other simple
> things to produce truly wonderful images.
>
> Of course it doesn't have the viewfinder of an M, what camera does?
Besides
> there is some adaptation to a new camera whether film or digital.
>
> Sure I have a few concerns about things like, well OK the price first! I
> wish it went to 800 with the quality of 100! :-) But then what film camera
> produces that without changing film? ;-)
>
> This Digilux 2 is a camera that takes a few tries to set it too your eye
and
> how you use the camera. I bet you went manual focus and manual everything
> else, right? Mistake!!!!!!!!! Like big mistake!
>
> Hell the best way to enjoy it right at the beginning is "GO ALL
AUTOMATIC!"
> Everything!!!!!!! I don't care what you think, do it this way and enjoy
what
> the camera can produce first, then go screw around with it in whatever
mode
> you wish.
>
> And I bet you'll come back to auto-everything because it works so
> beautifully you and many others will be very surprised at the quality
> certainly when they're popping out 13X19 prints! :-)
>
> You may not have ever done automatic everything before during your
> photographic life. However, there's a first time for everything and the
> Digilux 2 is the beginning of a whole new way of shooting. :-)
>
> Auto everything is the best way to go for openers so you kinda get the
> feeling of it and it's producing quality of what things look like.
>
> OK now you can undo yer flame suit! ;-) It's not as bad as you imply
simply
> because you seem to have played with it for only a few minutes and what's
> that going to tell.......... everything negative as you pointed out!
>
> However, get one, rent or buy, you'll be extremely and positively
surprised
> at the incredible positive results.
>
> ted
>
>
>
> =========================================================
> To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive
MUST be replied to per instructions. You may also log in to the Web
interface to unsubscribe.
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in
the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to
per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
- References:
- PAW 22: Warbirds - careful, WW II vets!
- From: Mark Bohrer
- Re: PAW 22: Warbirds - careful, WW II vets!
- From: Douglas M. Sharp
- Four New Pix
- From: Carl Socolow
- Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- From: Bill Lawlor
- Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- From: Ted Grant
Other related posts:
- » Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » RE: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » RE: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » Re:A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » RE: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » Re:A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- PAW 22: Warbirds - careful, WW II vets!
- From: Mark Bohrer
- Re: PAW 22: Warbirds - careful, WW II vets!
- From: Douglas M. Sharp
- Four New Pix
- From: Carl Socolow
- Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- From: Bill Lawlor
- Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- From: Ted Grant