Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- From: Mark Bohrer <lurchl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 17:06:39 -0700
I had an easy time transitioning through Fuji S1 and Nikon D1H to EOS 1D
and 10D dSLRs because they're all so 35mm camera-like. I can't imagine
using an electronic viewfinder unless it's very, very good. And it doesn't
sound like the Digilux is that good. Oh well, just have to wait for the
digital M or Epson-Cosina to use my M-lenses with digital. Meantime I'm
using them on M6 TTL and M7 and rediscovering film. Cool stuff!
I last went to the San Francisco Carnaval Parade in the Mission District
many years ago. Do the women still wear the floss-bikinis and heavy makeup
and is the music still as happy, Bill?
At 04:16 PM 5/31/2004, you wrote:
Yesterday I went with some Leica-mates to do street photography at the big
Carnaval parade and festival in San Francisco's Mission district. I
discovered that the stranger on my left in the crowd was shooting with a
Digilux 2. Although he was a French tourist we were able to exchange the
usual pleasantries about the other's good taste in brand of camera. Curious
to try the Digilux, I offered him a chance to make a few pics with my M3/
90mm TE. He passed the solid state wonder to me. I found it difficult to
maintain my friendly composure and nearly was unable to resist a cry of
merde! The Digilux seemed like a cheap plastic toy compared to the heft of
the M3. The electronic viewfinder was a cruel joke. A toy telescope would
run circles around that grainy little window. I can't believe the Digilux
has been widely praised by M owners. The only digital camera I have used is
the Canon 300D. IMO, a much more serious camera than that silly digi.
Donning my flameproof suit and helmet,
Bill Lawlor
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then
receive MUST be replied to per instructions. You may also log in to the
Web interface to unsubscribe.
Mark Bohrer
www.mountain-and-desert.com
Adventure travel and wildlife photography
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in
the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to
per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- From: Bill Lawlor
- References:
- PAW 22: Warbirds - careful, WW II vets!
- From: Mark Bohrer
- Re: PAW 22: Warbirds - careful, WW II vets!
- From: Douglas M. Sharp
- Four New Pix
- From: Carl Socolow
- Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- From: Bill Lawlor
Other related posts:
- » Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » RE: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » RE: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » Re:A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » RE: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- » Re:A chance encounter with the digilux 2
Yesterday I went with some Leica-mates to do street photography at the big Carnaval parade and festival in San Francisco's Mission district. I discovered that the stranger on my left in the crowd was shooting with a Digilux 2. Although he was a French tourist we were able to exchange the usual pleasantries about the other's good taste in brand of camera. Curious to try the Digilux, I offered him a chance to make a few pics with my M3/ 90mm TE. He passed the solid state wonder to me. I found it difficult to maintain my friendly composure and nearly was unable to resist a cry of merde! The Digilux seemed like a cheap plastic toy compared to the heft of the M3. The electronic viewfinder was a cruel joke. A toy telescope would run circles around that grainy little window. I can't believe the Digilux has been widely praised by M owners. The only digital camera I have used is the Canon 300D. IMO, a much more serious camera than that silly digi.
Donning my flameproof suit and helmet, Bill Lawlor
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
========================================================= To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
- Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- From: Bill Lawlor
- PAW 22: Warbirds - careful, WW II vets!
- From: Mark Bohrer
- Re: PAW 22: Warbirds - careful, WW II vets!
- From: Douglas M. Sharp
- Four New Pix
- From: Carl Socolow
- Re: A chance encounter with the digilux 2
- From: Bill Lawlor