Re: 50/2.8 Elmars...
- From: Steve Barbour <kididdoc@xxxxxxx>
- To: LEG Group <leica@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Leica Users Group <lug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:42:41 -0700
my thanks to all those who responded to these questions...Steve
On Feb 24, 2006, at 8:45 AM, Steve Barbour wrote:
Is there any optical difference between the old chrome 50/2.8
collapsible Elmars of the 1950's to 1974, and the newer 50/2.8
Elmars which were issued starting sometime in the 1990's...
Does anyone experienced in using these lenses see any differences
in the photos from them?
Which vintage is preferable if in good shape, and the cost not
considered?
I appreciate your advice, Steve
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you
then receive MUST be replied to per instructions. You may also log
in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in
the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to
per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
- References:
- 50/2.8 Elmars...
- From: Steve Barbour
Other related posts:
- » 50/2.8 Elmars...
- » Re: 50/2.8 Elmars...
- » Re: 50/2.8 Elmars...
- » Re: 50/2.8 Elmars...
- » Re: 50/2.8 Elmars...
On Feb 24, 2006, at 8:45 AM, Steve Barbour wrote:
Does anyone experienced in using these lenses see any differences in the photos from them?
Which vintage is preferable if in good shape, and the cost not considered?
I appreciate your advice, Steve
=========================================================
To Unsubscribe: Send email to leica-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field. The acknowledgment that you then receive MUST be replied to per instructions. You may also log in to the Web interface to unsubscribe.
- 50/2.8 Elmars...
- From: Steve Barbour