[kismac] Re: wireless equipment
- From: ard.jonker@xxxxxxxxx
- To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 22:47:21 +0200
<sorry to dup a few of Brad's comments here, just read his msg after
writing this. I don't mind Andrew picking on me, these arguments
possibly will work out to get us all better antennas through the
desings of either flavour. Brad, do you have links to the coffee can
spreadsheet?>
At 17:48 -0400 03/10/01, Andrew1300@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Man... whatever happened to the pringles can antenna? I build 3 of
>them and use the all the time. The $12 pringles can antenna perform
>better than the $50 directional wireless antenna I purchased at Frys
>(Trendware TEW-IA06D). =P I admit I didn't buy the highest end antenna,
>but come on now... if a pringles can can beat it, that's sad.
Various sources on the web, including sites that publish downloadable
spreadsheets to calculate optimum tube size and antenna stub
placement, show argumentedly that a pringles is not the most optimal
or easiest design.
And, after 9.11, you run a serious risk of being arrested for walking
around with a ground-to-air missile lookalike when you use a pringles
can. The pattern of a pringles can is not really one wants when doing
surveys of LANs, I guess, unless you are generally surveying from
the top of your house. I hope you don't live near a landing strip in
that case d8-)
>I admit not all of mine do though. Two of mine work great, one
>works like crap.
See? ;-) My patches worked all (three of them) without a hitch. And
they are more 'stealthy' too; less bulky.
> Anyway, I can use my Airport AP from over a block away with a
>pringles can pointing to it. =P And while "war"driving I can pick AP's
>that are often two blocks behind the house I point the can at. Are you
>just too lazy to make it? It really isn't THAT hard. There are a good
>50-60 tutorials online right now.
The pringles make me sick, and I'm raised with the idea not to throw
away food, no matter how bad tasting, nor to harm other peoples
health (read: feed them pringles). The patch antenna I quoted is,
well, really simple, easier to reproduce than a pringles antenna. The
latter needs millimeter accuracy on various details, in a tube, the
patch antenna I can just cut with my kitchen table scissors with
overall mm accuracy on flat sheet materials. And I cheated by using a
simpler design (no drilling). Heck, I even soldered using a stove
rather than a soldering iron!
> I looked at that that patch antenna... I honestly don't even want
>to try it, it looks kinda sketchy. But I'll give it a shot and test it
>compared to the pringles and let you guys know how it compares.
Please do so. It probably looks way more difficult than it actually
is. I've contacted the author of the mentioned site and when time
permits, I'll send him photographs of my tackle, which he might use
to extend the website. Possibly the weekend gives me an opportunity;
too much rain to have fun war-walking ;-)
Here is a preview of the images, this is after the original setup
(notice slugs)
<http://www.xs4all.nl/~amtha/kismac/MVC00257.JPG>
and this is the more streamlined version of the same setup, & easier to make:
<http://www.xs4all.nl/~amtha/kismac/MVC00254.JPG>
ard
- Follow-Ups:
- [kismac] decoding log
- From: Jkr
- References:
- [kismac] Re: wireless equipment
- From: Andrew1300
Other related posts:
- » [kismac] Re: wireless equipment
- » [kismac] Re: wireless equipment
- » [kismac] Re: wireless equipment
- » [kismac] Re: wireless equipment
- » [kismac] Re: wireless equipment
- » [kismac] Re: wireless equipment
- » [kismac] Re: wireless equipment
- » [kismac] Re: wireless equipment
- » [kismac] Re: wireless equipment
- » [kismac] Re: wireless equipment
- » [kismac] Re: wireless equipment
- » [kismac] Re: wireless equipment
- » [kismac] Re: wireless equipment
- [kismac] decoding log
- From: Jkr
- [kismac] Re: wireless equipment
- From: Andrew1300