[kismac] Re: what's the right svn?

  • From: Aki <achileos@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 20:11:21 +0200

Also tried Developement version, seems to work, but my USB Dongle
seems to not be well supported so I get weird errors ^^ And I'm not
enough skilled to find and fix the problem, so I'm also clueless.

Good luck to our devellopers :)

On 10/14/06, devnullian@xxxxxxx <devnullian@xxxxxxx> wrote:
A build from within Xcode creates a working KisMAC as a development
build.

Also, svn info does have a line 'revision: 207', but I'm totally
clueless with sed, so I can't fix it.

devnullian
On Oct 14, 2006, at 12:02 PM, devnullian@xxxxxxx wrote:

> I'm having the same problem.  I'm going to try a build from within
> Xcode and see what happens...
>
> Devnullian
> On Oct 14, 2006, at 11:52 AM, Aki wrote:
>
>> Got same problem with subversion, but hasn't caused any problems yet,
>> as far as I know ^^
>> I also ondered why actuel Kismac version wasn't compiling, I got an
>> error when linking ... Any information on that ?
>>
>> -Aki
>>
>> On 10/14/06, devnullian@xxxxxxx <devnullian@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I recently fried the internal power supply on my powerbook and
>>> replaced it with a macbook.  I got the pre-packaged for OS X version
>>> of subversion, and now when I run compile.command, when it
>>> determines
>>> the svn revision, it says "invalid option n".  I looked into the
>>> compile.command script, and it runs 'svn version -n` but my copy of
>>> subversion doesn't recognize the command 'version.'  Do I need to
>>> get
>>> the Darwin Ports version instead?  Has that command been depricated?
>>>
>>> As a work-around, I can edit compile.command to hard-code the
>>> version
>>> instead of determining it automagically, so this isn't a show
>>> stopper.
>>>
>>> Devnullian
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>




Other related posts: