[kismac] Re: misc stuff

  • From: "Christoph Koehler" <christoph.koehler@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: kismac@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:12:25 -0600

Thanks, I will check my logs and let you know!


On 2/26/06, Geoffrey Kruse <gkruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> May routers will log known attacks if they detect them.  It might be
> helpful to see if you router is noticing these attacks.
>
> Geoff
> On Feb 26, 2006, at 5:09 PM, Christoph Koehler wrote:
>
> > Ah, you are right, that's probably it!
> > Reinjection seemed to work, although very slowly (which might mean
> > it's not working at all, I don't know). Kismac told me it's
> > reinjecting packets. My router was set to b and g, both.
> > For some reason deauth doesn't work at all. I could only test it with
> > my router, which is a WRT54GL, so it's pretty new. I have no idea why.
> > If you guys need me to do some test or so, I will gladly help do that!
> >
> > Christoph
> >
> >
> > On 2/26/06, Geoffrey Kruse <gkruse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> You probably didn't notice an increase in packets while downloading
> >> with your airport extreme because the ae is 802.11g and the usb is
> >> b.  Therefore, the b adaptor is not going to be able to catch all of
> >> the packets.  I have also noticed that re-injection  doesn't seem to
> >> work on a g base station either when using a usb adaptor.  I have
> >> used de-authentication successfully though.
> >>
> >> Geoff
> >> On Feb 26, 2006, at 1:37 PM, Christoph Koehler wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hey guys,
> >>>
> >>> there are a few things I noticed with my dwl 122 card, and I don't
> >>> know if they are right or now.
> >>> First of all, deauthentication doesn't work, but that might be my
> >>> router.
> >>> Second, I was downloading a linux iso with my AE card at several
> >>> 100kb/s, and capturing at the same time with my dwl 122. Traffic
> >>> captured did not increase as fast as my actual download speed was. I
> >>> don't know if this was caused by using the same machine for both.
> >>> Thirdly, authentication flood works in that I see all the bogus
> >>> clients in the list, but packet count doesn't really increase
> >>> significantly. IV and inj packets stay at 0.
> >>>
> >>> So, I was just wondering if that is normal, or if it's a bug.
> >>>
> >>> Christoph
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>

Other related posts: